IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › CloudBees · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CloudBees

6Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CloudBees was named 2 times in Feature flags, where LaunchDarkly led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business28 of 33

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 31

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 33

under the label threshold

In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CloudBees for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Feature flags	Developer platform	0%	15 of 31	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by LaunchDarkly at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudBees yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudBees across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudBees, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudBees was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LaunchDarkly6 of 64Not in the top three

Unleash6 of 60Not in the top three

Flagsmith5 of 60Not in the top three

GrowthBook4 of 60Not in the top three

Statsig4 of 60Not in the top three

ConfigCat3 of 61Not in the top three

Harness3 of 60Not in the top three

PostHog3 of 60Not in the top three

Split3 of 60Not in the top three

DevCycle2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudBees. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named CloudBees and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getunleash.io5

amplitude.com4

g2.com4

growthbook.io4

harness.io4

statsig.com4

toolradar.com4

flagsmith.com3

launchdarkly.com3

abtesting.cc2

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming CloudBees came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

toolradar.com/guides/best-feature-flag-tools4

amplitude.com/compare/top-feature-flag-solutions-for-product-teams3

harness.io/blog/feature-flag-tools-compared-10-best-platforms-for-safer-releases3

statsig.com/blog/comparing-feature-flag-platform-costs3

amplitude.com/compare/best-feature-flag-tools2

cpoclub.com/tools/best-feature-flag-software2

g2.com/categories/feature-management/enterprise2

g2.com/products/launchdarkly/reviews2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudBees's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudBees, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudbees.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.