AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ARIS · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

ARIS

28Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Process mining for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ARIS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint0%20 of 610%9under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%
Enterprise architecture toolsIT operations and endpoint0%65 of 1130%1under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ARIS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ARIS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00202
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ARIS (Software AG) | Best for modeling and governance, though heavier on the IT side.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose ARIS for regulated environments needing formal conformance and governance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“Solid process intelligence platform with strong governance features” MiniMax M2.5 · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“ARIS when modeling and governance are central” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ARIS, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ARIS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform25 of 289Not among the top eight
UiPath Process Mining20 of 283Not among the top eight
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence20 of 281Not among the top eight
IBM Process Mining15 of 282Not among the top eight
Apromore10 of 281Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate7 of 283Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining4 of 280Not among the top eight
ABBYY Timeline3 of 280Not among the top eight
Pega3 of 280Not among the top eight
ProM3 of 280Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ARIS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named ARIS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bardeen.ai15
erpresearch.com11
processexcellencenetwork.com11
g2.com10
gartner.com9
learn.g2.com9
ibm.com7
kyp.ai7
processmind.com7
signavio.com7

Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming ARIS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

aris.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ARIS takes 0% of first choices and Apromore takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “process mining tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “process mining tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“aris”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
85,442 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 12,604 a month
Searches its site ranks for
386 · 44 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,198
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
26 ads · 23 text, 3 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as ARIS USA Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 25 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 61 in process mining
Segment leader
19%
Apromore
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
28 answers
Its own site cited
in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on aris.com
328
subdomains included
Content
234
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
29 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog139182026-10-01Process mining, Business continuity
Conference or event69142026-10-02Process mining, GRC
News or press1222026-10-01
Webinar or virtual event402026-03-11Process mining
Glossary or explainer412026-07-16Process mining
Report or ebook302025-10-29
Case study202025-10-29
Comparison1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aris.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as ARIS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ARIS; a claim can dispute any of them.
ARIS (Software AG) 2Software AG/ARIS 1

Follow ARIS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ARIS is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Process Context Platform for Enterprise AI
For
G2000 organizations
Free plan or trial
free consultation aris.com
Certifications
ISO 9001:2015ISO 22301ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019SOC 2SOC 3Cyber Essentials
Customers named
Rolls-RoyceBootsSiemens AGStandard BankDubai Health AuthoritySiemensNationwideL&G Asset Management
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What ARIS's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aris.com, trust.aris.com, aris.com/platform, aris.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ARIS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ARIS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ARIS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ARIS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ARIS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aris.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.