AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Bold BI · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Bold BI

6Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bold BI was named 4 times in Embedded analytics, where Metabase led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 73
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 72
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bold BI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform2%13 of 720%4under 10 labels · led by Metabase at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bold BI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bold BI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Bold BI as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company looking for embedded BI” MiniMax M2.5 · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Affordable per-user licensing, SSO, self-hosting on AWS/Azure. Free trial; suits small teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · alternative
“Designed for app embedding; strong in GetApp/Capterra for mid-size.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bold BI, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bold BI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Metabase4 of 62Not among the top eight
Zoho Analytics4 of 61Not among the top eight
Sisense3 of 61Not among the top eight
ThoughtSpot Embedded3 of 61Not among the top eight
Luzmo3 of 60Not among the top eight
Reveal BI2 of 61Not among the top eight
Power BI Embedded2 of 60Not among the top eight
Tableau2 of 60Not among the top eight
Explo1 of 61Not among the top eight
GoodData1 of 61Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bold BI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Bold BI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

holistics.io5
zoho.com5
peliqan.io4
cube.dev3
embeddable.com3
explo.co3
omni.co3
querio.ai3
thoughtspot.com3
astrato.io2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Bold BI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

holistics.io/blog/best-embedded-analytics-tools5
zoho.com/analytics/insightshq/top-embedded-analytics-tools.html5
peliqan.io/blog/embedded-analytics-tools4
cube.dev/articles/best-embedded-analytics-platforms-20263
embeddable.com/blog/embedded-analytics-pricing-and-benefit-comparison3
explo.co/blog/embedded-analytics-platforms3
omni.co/articles/best-embedded-analytics-tools-20263
astrato.io/blog/embedded-bi-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

boldbi.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Bold BI takes 2% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
9
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 72 in embedded analytics
Segment leader
22%
Metabase
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on boldbi.com
1,336
subdomains included
Content
1,029
counted in the table below
Documentation
15
Product · Integration
0 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog777112026-10-05Embedded analytics, ETL
Glossary or explainer151undatedEmbedded analytics
Comparison3612026-09-18Embedded analytics
News or press2802019-06-19
Webinar or virtual event16undatedEmbedded analytics
Case study1302022-09-23
Report or ebook402025-12-12
Conference or event3undated
Podcast or video1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page boldbi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Bold BI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bold BI is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Embedded BI & AI Analytics for SaaS Products
boldbi.com
For
SaaS products and enterprise applications
boldbi.com
Price stated
application-based pricing boldbi.com
Free plan or trial
30-day free trial with full feature access. No credit card required. boldbi.com
Integrations claimed
140 boldbi.com
Hosting
EUManaged regionsCustomer-selected data region
Customers named
SysconNetworcxA4BDigiQuipCarNowRevverSmartway2GeniusVets
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications

What Bold BI's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: boldbi.com, boldbi.com/pricing, trust.boldbi.com, boldbi.com/case-studies, boldbi.com/resources/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bold BI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bold BI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bold BI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bold BI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bold BI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at boldbi.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.