| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded analytics | Data platform | 5% | 7 of 72 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Metabase at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Quick Pick: Reveal BI edges out for most mid-market B2B SaaS due to SMB/mid-focus, control over UX, and growth-friendly pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · first choice
“such as Reveal BI, which offers SDK-based embedding and greater control over the in-app analytics experience” Llama 4 Maverick · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · first choice
“Reveal BI and Luzmo frequently win for product teams needing SDK control without enterprise overhead” Kimi K2 · Embedded analytics · scale prompt · first choice
“Reveal BI is positioned specifically for SMBs and mid-market SaaS that want more control over the in-app experience.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Reveal BI and are not a share of its labels.
127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Reveal BI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 113 | 2 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 56 | 2 | 2026-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 26 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 0 | 2022-03-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 23 | 20 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Every page revealbi.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Reveal BI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: revealbi.io, revealbi.io/security, revealbi.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reveal BI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reveal BI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reveal BI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: