AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › bearhug · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

bearhug

8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. bearhug was named 2 times in CSPM, where Wiz led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named bearhug for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cloud security posture managementCloud and infrastructure0%30 of 800%2under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, bearhug held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CSPM · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 of 69, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 of 73, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CSPM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 30 of 80, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated bearhug across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with Prowler Cloud or Bearhug if you want a clean, no-maintenance web dashboard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CSPM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as bearhug, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and bearhug was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wiz7 of 80Not among the top eight
Prowler6 of 82Not among the top eight
AWS Security Hub6 of 80Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Cloud5 of 81Not among the top eight
Orca Security5 of 81Not among the top eight
Prisma Cloud4 of 80Not among the top eight
Aikido Security3 of 82Not among the top eight
Cyscale3 of 80Not among the top eight
Vanta2 of 81Not among the top eight
Google Security Command Center2 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named bearhug. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named bearhug and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bearhug.cloudYour site8
complyjet.com6
sentinelone.com6
gbhackers.com4
getsecureslate.com4
orca.security4
reddit.com4
github.com3
prowler.com3
sovereign-observer.com3

Thirty-seven of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming bearhug came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on bearhug.cloud
31
subdomains included
Content
13
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
4 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Comparison812026-09-24CSPM
Report or ebook332026-09-24
Blog2undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bearhug.cloud exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as bearhug

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as bearhug; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bearhug 1

Follow bearhug

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

bearhug is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AWS Cloud Security Posture Management Made Simple
For
teams without a security team
Price stated
$100 per AWS account per month bearhug.cloud
Starting price
$100 bearhug.cloud
Free plan or trial
14-day free trial bearhug.cloud
Certifications
GDPRSOC 2ISO 27001PCI DSSCyber Essentials
Hosting
United Kingdomany AWS Region where Security Hub is available
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, customers

What bearhug's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: bearhug.cloud, bearhug.cloud/pricing, bearhug.cloud/features/multi-account. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when bearhug's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as bearhug, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for bearhug by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where bearhug is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name bearhug, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bearhug.cloud is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.