Every category where a model named AWS Glue Data Catalog for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data catalogs and governance	Data platform	0%	12 of 83	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AWS Glue Data Catalog yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AWS Glue Data Catalog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need a fully managed solution and can budget for usage, consider Microsoft Purview or AWS Glue.” Mistral Small · Data catalogs · budget prompt · alternative

“Serverless, tight AWS integration, low operational overhead” Kimi K2 · Data catalogs · comparative prompt · alternative

“AWS Glue Data Catalog (Best for AWS Users)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data catalogs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Who to be cautious with: AWS Glue/Data Zone, Azure Purview, Google Cloud Dataplex.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data catalogs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AWS Glue Data Catalog, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS Glue Data Catalog was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Collibra26 of 316Not among the top eight

Alation24 of 313Not among the top eight

DataHub23 of 313Not among the top eight

OpenMetadata22 of 317Not among the top eight

Atlan22 of 313Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview18 of 310Not among the top eight

Secoda15 of 315Not among the top eight

Apache Atlas14 of 310Not among the top eight

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud13 of 311Not among the top eight

Databricks Unity Catalog12 of 311Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS Glue Data Catalog. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 31 answers that named AWS Glue Data Catalog and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com23

kanerika.com17

ovaledge.com17

decube.io14

data.world10

erstudio.com10

secoda.co9

basedash.com8

alation.com6

datatrail.ai6

120 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming AWS Glue Data Catalog came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlan.com/data-catalog-tools16

kanerika.com/blogs/data-catalog-tools15

decube.io/post/top-data-catalog-tools14

erstudio.com/blog/data-catalog-tools9

ovaledge.com/blog/data-catalog-pricing-guide9

data.world/resources/compare/data-catalog-tools7

ovaledge.com/blog/top-data-catalogs7

basedash.com/blog/best-data-catalog-tools-compared-20266

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where AWS Glue Data Catalog stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“aws glue data catalog”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 11 a month
Its own site: It sits on AWS's site (aws.amazon.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 83 in data catalogs

Segment leader

44%

Atlan

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 31 answers
Its own site cited: in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as AWS Glue Data Catalog

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AWS Glue Data Catalog; a claim can dispute any of them.

AWS Glue 3AWS Glue Catalog 2AWS Glue Data Catalog / SageMaker Catalog 1AWS Glue/Data Zone 1

Follow AWS Glue Data Catalog

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AWS is the company behind AWS Glue Data Catalog.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from AWS: AWS ACM, AWS ACM Private CA, AWS ALB, AWS ALB/ELB, AWS ALB/NLB, AWS API Gateway HTTP APIs, AWS Amazon Aurora, AWS App Runner and 87 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: a centralized metadata store that integrates with Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) and provides immediate data querying using Amazon Athena, Amazon EMR, and Amazon Redshift Spectrum
aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/create-an-aws-glue-data-catalog-with-aws-dms
For: Businesses need near realtime access to the latest data and metadata available from many silos to perform analytics.
aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/create-an-aws-glue-data-catalog-with-aws-dms
Integrations claimed: 3 aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/create-an-aws-glue-data-catalog-with-aws-dms
Hosting: us-east-1
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, customers

What AWS Glue Data Catalog's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/create-an-aws-glue-data-catalog-with-aws-dms, aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/use-aws-glue-data-catalog-views-to-analyze-data, aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/introducing-aws-glue-data-catalog-usage-metrics-for-api-usage, aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/cross-account-aws-glue-data-catalog-access-with-amazon-athena, aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/query-cross-account-aws-glue-data-catalogs-using-amazon-athena. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS Glue Data Catalog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS Glue Data Catalog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS Glue Data Catalog by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where AWS Glue Data Catalog is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWS Glue Data Catalog, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.