AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › AvePoint Cloud Management · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

AvePoint Cloud Management

17Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in M365 management for enterprise buyers
Rank 81 of 149 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In m365 management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AvePoint Cloud Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Microsoft 365 managementIT operations and endpoint0%81 of 14933%3under 10 labels · led by CoreView at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AvePoint Cloud Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AvePoint Cloud Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500112
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Emphasizes policy enforcement, content lifecycle management, and automation across SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive.” Perplexity Sonar · M365 management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The learning curve comes up repeatedly, with customers noting the interface feels overwhelming initially” Claude Haiku 4.5 · M365 management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AvePoint Cloud Management, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AvePoint Cloud Management was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CoreView13 of 174Not among the top eight
ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus9 of 171Not among the top eight
BetterCloud7 of 170Not among the top eight
ShareGate6 of 171Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 Admin Center5 of 171Not among the top eight
Microsoft Intune3 of 171Not among the top eight
Syskit Point3 of 171Not among the top eight
AdminDroid3 of 170Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 Lighthouse3 of 170Not among the top eight
Syncro3 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AvePoint Cloud Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named AvePoint Cloud Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com16
g2.com16
cloudfuze.com9
microsoft.com9
sourceforge.net9
getnerdio.com7
syncrosecure.com7
manageengine.com6
admindroid.com5
coreview.com5

No domain is on file for AvePoint Cloud Management, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where AvePoint Cloud Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
10 a month (“avepoint cloud management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 81 of 149 in M365 management
Segment leader
20%
CoreView
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow AvePoint Cloud Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AvePoint Cloud Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AvePoint Cloud Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AvePoint Cloud Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AvePoint Cloud Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AvePoint Cloud Management, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.