IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Authelia · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Authelia

7Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Authelia was named 4 times in MFA and 2 other categories, where Cisco Duo led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business47 of 53

under the label threshold

Mid-market19 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In mfa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Authelia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	19 of 78	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%
Identity governance	Identity and access	0%	32 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	30 of 48	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Authelia yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Authelia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider open\u2011source tools like Keycloak, Authelia, or Authentik.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · MFA · budget prompt · alternative

“ultra-lightweight (≈20 MB) authentication/authorization server” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · budget prompt · alternative

“Keycloak or Authelia (open source)” Kimi K2 · MFA · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“promise transparency and zero licensing costs, but carry hidden burdens” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Authelia, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Authelia was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Keycloak7 of 70Not in the top three

Cisco Duo5 of 73Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID5 of 73Not in the top three

Authentik4 of 70Not in the top three

Google Authenticator4 of 70Not in the top three

Microsoft Authenticator3 of 70Not in the top three

Auth02 of 70Not in the top three

CyberArk Identity2 of 70Not in the top three

JumpCloud2 of 70Not in the top three

Okta2 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Authelia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Authelia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

aimultiple.com3

plivo.com3

startwithidentity.com3

techrepublic.com3

automateed.com2

blog.cybelesoft.com2

encomputers.com2

expertinsights.com2

nhimg.org2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Authelia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/open-source-mfa3

g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-mfa-solution-for-smbs3

plivo.com/blog/best-multi-factor-authentication-solutions-for-business3

techrepublic.com/article/best-multi-factor-authentication-solutions3

automateed.com/affordable-mfa-alternatives2

blog.cybelesoft.com/cost-effective-mfa-for-small-business2

encomputers.com/2024/05/best-multi-factor-authentication-small-businesses2

1kosmos.com/resources/blog/workforce-identity-verification-vendor-category1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Authelia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Authelia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at authelia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.