Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 39
1 category · RankedBitbucket Pipelines
35Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CI/CD for small business buyers
Rank 17 of 43 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 41
0%23 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market17 of 43
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 47
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Bitbucket Pipelines for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI/CD platforms | Developer platform | 0% | 17 of 43 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 68% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Bitbucket Pipelines held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CI/CD · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 26 of 39
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 29 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI/CD | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 17 of 43 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Bitbucket Pipelines across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Bitbucket Pipelines across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Small teams already using Bitbucket and Jira who want a straightforward solution.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CI/CD · comparative prompt · alternative
“Already on Bitbucket Cloud? Try Bitbucket Pipelines before adding a separate CI service.” GPT-6 Luna · CI/CD · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Bitbucket Pipelines if you already live in Bitbucket.” GPT-5.4 mini · CI/CD · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if you want portability: Bitbucket Pipelines (unless you promise never to leave Bitbucket).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative
“Only 50 free minutes/month (too limited)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CI/CD · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bitbucket Pipelines, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitbucket Pipelines was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bitbucket Pipelines, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitbucket Pipelines was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitbucket Pipelines. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 35 answers that named Bitbucket Pipelines and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dev.to12
blog.jetbrains.com11
atlassian.com10
deployhq.com8
about.gitlab.com7
circleci.com7
cloud.folio3.com7
docs.github.com7
docs.gitlab.com7
github.com7
Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Bitbucket Pipelines came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bitbucket.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bitbucket Pipelines takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Actions takes 68%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bitbucket.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bitbucket Pipelines takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Actions takes 68%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ci/cd platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ci/cd platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“bitbucket pipelines”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 97 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 22,601 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,831 · 284 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 70,858
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 43 in CI/CD
Segment leader
68%
GitHub Actions
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on bitbucket.org
8
subdomains included
Content
2
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2 | 0 | 2024-04-12 |
Most recent
- 2024-04-12Generate pull request descriptions with atlassian intelligence blog
- 2023-08-09Ai blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page bitbucket.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Bitbucket Pipelines
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Bitbucket Pipelines is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Bitbucket Pipelines is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Scale CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Bitbucket Pipelines's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bitbucket.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitbucket Pipelines's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitbucket Pipelines, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitbucket Pipelines by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Bitbucket Pipelines is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bitbucket Pipelines, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.