Every category where a model named Bitbucket Pipelines for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CI/CD platforms	Developer platform	0%	13 of 45	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitbucket Pipelines yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitbucket Pipelines across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Atlassian/Jira stack? → Bitbucket Pipelines (3.5K free mins, $3/mo start).” Grok 4.1 Fast · CI/CD · budget prompt · alternative

“if you're invested in the Atlassian ecosystem, Bitbucket Pipelines” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CI/CD · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“best fit for teams centered on Bitbucket/Atlassian tooling” Perplexity Sonar · CI/CD · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"If you absolutely hate yourself and want arguably the worst 'modern-ish' CI/CD platform, BitBucket Pipelines."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

“user feedback in the provided results is notably negative... treat it as a caution signal” Perplexity Sonar · CI/CD · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitbucket Pipelines, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitbucket Pipelines was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Actions23 of 2417Not in the top three

GitLab CI/CD23 of 243Not in the top three

CircleCI20 of 240Not in the top three

Jenkins20 of 240Not in the top three

Azure DevOps7 of 240Not in the top three

Buildkite7 of 240Not in the top three

JetBrains TeamCity6 of 240Not in the top three

Travis CI6 of 240Not in the top three

Argo CD4 of 240Not in the top three

Atlassian Bamboo4 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitbucket Pipelines. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 24 answers that named Bitbucket Pipelines and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deployhq.com10

toolradar.com10

checkthat.ai9

saaspedia.dev7

blog.jetbrains.com6

cicdcalculator.com5

dev.to5

devopsplatforms.com5

octopus.com5

augmentcode.com4

Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Bitbucket Pipelines came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

deployhq.com/blog/best-ci-cd-software-top-10-tools-to-know-in-202510

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-ci-cd-tools9

toolradar.com/blog/best-ci-cd-tools8

saaspedia.dev/posts/best-ci-cd-platforms7

blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2026/03/best-ci-tools5

devopsplatforms.com/buying-guides/best-ci-cd-platforms5

cicdcalculator.com/free-ci-cd-platforms4

incredibuild.com/blog/best-ci-cd-pipeline-tools-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitbucket Pipelines's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitbucket Pipelines, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitbucket.org is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.