Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 24 of 39
1 category · RankedJetBrains TeamCity
58Judge labels
2First choices
10Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in CI/CD for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 43 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of JetBrains TeamCity →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 41
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market11 of 43
0%24 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 47
4%23 labels
accepted challenger
In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named JetBrains TeamCity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI/CD platforms | Developer platform | 0% | 11 of 43 | 21% | 24 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, JetBrains TeamCity held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CI/CD · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 42 → 10 of 39
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 11 → 5 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI/CD | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 11 of 43 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated JetBrains TeamCity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated JetBrains TeamCity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels2
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TeamCity: A CI/CD tool that is suitable for companies of all sizes, including mid-sized B2B companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · CI/CD · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“TeamCity, which is praised for its fine-grained access control” Mistral Small · CI/CD · direct prompt · alternative
“Winners for scale: TeamCity, GitLab, CircleCI” Grok 4.20 · CI/CD · scale prompt · alternative
“TeamCity is the strongest alternative” Perplexity Sonar · CI/CD · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"TeamCity is also considered a legacy CI/CD provider. Many organizations are actively migrating away from it"” Muse Glimmer 30B · CI/CD · negative prompt · soft negative
“often cited as a legacy tool that lacks the scalability and ease of use of newer platforms” Mistral Small · CI/CD · negative prompt · soft negative
“Approach with strict security controls and rigorous secrets management.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · soft negative
“Only choose if you're already invested in the JetBrains ecosystem.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CI/CD · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JetBrains TeamCity, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JetBrains TeamCity was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as JetBrains TeamCity, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JetBrains TeamCity was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JetBrains TeamCity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 58 answers that named JetBrains TeamCity and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.jetbrains.comYour site45
harness.io28
northflank.com21
atlassian.com20
learn.g2.com20
octopus.com18
deployhq.com17
accelq.com15
spacelift.io15
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com14
168 of the 213 domain citations in answers naming JetBrains TeamCity came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
jetbrains.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, JetBrains TeamCity takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Actions takes 68%.ShowHide
Search and answers
jetbrains.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, JetBrains TeamCity takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Actions takes 68%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ci/cd platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ci/cd platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“jetbrains teamcity”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 485,270 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 46,115 · 4,001 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 73,782
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 43 in CI/CD
Segment leader
68%
GitHub Actions
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 58 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 56 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jetbrains.com
5,048
subdomains included
Content
4,087
counted in the table below
Documentation
51
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,520 | 40 | 2026-09-28 | ASM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 313 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 104 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 85 | 0 | 2022-10-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 43 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2023-02-01 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2023-04-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2020-12-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Dotnet blog
- 2026-09-01JetBrains Air: Building a System of Products for Agentic Software Development - The JetBrains Blog blog
- 2026-09-01Introducing jetbrains air blog
- 2026-09-01Join us at the zephyr project meetup in amsterdam conference or event
- 2026-09-01Hard fault debugging blog
- 2026-09-01Rd 2026 2 3 blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 15, 2026Zephyr Project Meetup in AmsterdamJetBrains Amsterdam, Gelrestraat 16, 1079 MZ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands · took part
- September 15, 2026 to September 16, 2026TransformConfTobacco Dock, London, UK · took part
- November 18, 2025JetBrains AI Meetup Seoul 2025Seoul · hosted
As the event pages on jetbrains.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jetbrains.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as JetBrains TeamCity
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JetBrains TeamCity; a claim can dispute any of them.
TeamCity 22TeamCity (JetBrains) 1
Follow JetBrains TeamCity
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
JetBrains TeamCity is its own company.ShowHide
The company
JetBrains TeamCity is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Powerful continuous integration out of the box
- For
- teams
- Customers named
- Gradle Inc.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What JetBrains TeamCity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jetbrains.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JetBrains TeamCity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JetBrains TeamCity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JetBrains TeamCity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where JetBrains TeamCity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name JetBrains TeamCity, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.