IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Travis CI · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Travis CI

18Judge labels

0First choices

13Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Travis CI was named 7 times in CI/CD, where GitHub Actions led with 65%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business52 of 55

under the label threshold

Mid-market44 of 45

under the label threshold

Enterprise40 of 41

under the label threshold

In ci/cd · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Travis CI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CI/CD platforms	Developer platform	0%	44 of 45	71%	7	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Travis CI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Travis CI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“It is no longer recommended for new projects or teams prioritizing security and ease of use.” Mistral Small · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

“Travis CI — HIGH CAUTION ... consider alternatives for sensitive projects” Kimi K2 · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

“The poster child for "avoid."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

“The Verdict: Avoid.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Travis CI, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Travis CI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Actions18 of 189Not in the top three

GitLab CI/CD18 of 184Not in the top three

Jenkins18 of 180Not in the top three

CircleCI17 of 180Not in the top three

Atlassian Bamboo8 of 180Not in the top three

JetBrains TeamCity8 of 180Not in the top three

Azure DevOps7 of 180Not in the top three

Bitbucket Pipelines6 of 180Not in the top three

AWS CodePipeline5 of 180Not in the top three

Argo CD5 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Travis CI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 18 answers that named Travis CI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.jetbrains.com7

circleci.com7

octopus.com6

technologymatch.com5

deployhq.com4

harness.io4

stepsecurity.io4

toolradar.com4

checkthat.ai3

devopsness.com3

Forty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Travis CI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2026/03/best-ci-tools5

technologymatch.com/blog/jenkins-vs-gitlab-ci-vs-circleci-vs-github-actions-the-ci-cd-deci5

blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2026/06/bamboo-end-of-life4

circleci.com/blog/switch-ci-cd-platforms-7-warning-signs4

deployhq.com/blog/best-ci-cd-software-top-10-tools-to-know-in-20254

harness.io/blog/ci-cd-tools4

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-ci-cd-tools3

circleci.com/pricing3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Travis CI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Travis CI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at travis-ci.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.