AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › AppViewX · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

AppViewX

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AppViewX was named 1 time in NHI management, where JumpCloud led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market51 of 128
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise42 of 96
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In nhi management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AppViewX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Non-human identity managementIdentity and access0%51 of 1280%1under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AppViewX yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AppViewX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Keyfactor and AppViewX as strong alternates” Muse Glimmer 30B · NHI management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AppViewX, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppViewX was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HashiCorp Vault3 of 30Not among the top eight
Keyfactor3 of 30Not among the top eight
Astrix Security2 of 30Not among the top eight
CyberArk Identity Security Platform2 of 30Not among the top eight
DigiCert2 of 30Not among the top eight
GitGuardian NHI Governance2 of 30Not among the top eight
Entro Security1 of 31Not among the top eight
Oasis1 of 31Not among the top eight
One Identity1 of 31Not among the top eight
Active Roles1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AppViewX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named AppViewX and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com3
securityboulevard.com3
startupstash.com3
cyberpress.org2
f6s.com2
guideflow.com2
majorkeytech.com2
oneidentity.com2
startwithidentity.com2
wwt.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming AppViewX came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-nhi-management-solutions3
startupstash.com/top-non-human-identity-management-platforms3
cyberpress.org/machine-identity-management-by-use-case2
f6s.com/software/category/machine-identity-management2
guideflow.com/blog/machine-identity-management-software2
majorkeytech.com/blogs/best-iam-solutions2
oneidentity.com/learn/top-non-human-identity-and-agentic-ai-security-tools.aspx2
startwithidentity.com/articles/top-5-machine-identity-management-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

appviewx.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AppViewX takes 0% of first choices and JumpCloud takes 14%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “non-human identity management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best non-human identity management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 20,980 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,905 · 46 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,027
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
41 ads · 39 text, 2 image · 26 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as AppViewX, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 30 in the year, 11 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 128 in NHI management
Segment leader
14%
JumpCloud
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on appviewx.com
2,476
subdomains included
Content
1,222
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
40 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog56302026-06-30Certificate management, Load balancers
Glossary or explainer33712026-09-04Load balancers, EDR
News or press20942026-09-11Certificate management, NHI management
Case study4002022-09-07Certificate management
Conference or event2562026-10-28Certificate management
Podcast or video1602025-04-25
Webinar or virtual event1322026-07-22
Comparison1112026-07-07Certificate management
Report or ebook512026-09-15
Template or tool302020-11-27

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on appviewx.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page appviewx.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name certificate management (47); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow AppViewX

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AppViewX is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Machine & AI Agent Identity Security | CLM, PKI, PQC | AppViewX
appviewx.com
For
enterprise
appviewx.com
Price stated
Get a Custom Quote appviewx.com
Integrations claimed
200 appviewx.com
Certifications
FIPS-certified HSMsISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001 SoASOC 2FSQSNIST CSFPCI DSS v4.0.1ProcessUnity
Customers named
RabobankPacificSourceHong Kong’s Leading Healthcare ProviderA Global Law FirmAgricultural Financial Services CompanyMultinational Apparel CompanyThe City of Cape TownXcel Energy
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What AppViewX's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: appviewx.com, trust.appviewx.com, appviewx.com/solutions, appviewx.com/customers, appviewx.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppViewX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppViewX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppViewX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AppViewX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AppViewX, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appviewx.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.