AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow · October 2026 Edition
Amazon · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow

21Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow was named 8 times in Orchestration, where Prefect led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business60 of 86
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 79
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 108
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workflow orchestrationData platform0%20 of 7912%8under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 21%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Orchestration · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 57 → 58 of 81
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 19 of 72
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 18 of 103

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Orchestration0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 62 → 20 of 79

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase10 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“use a managed version (like Google Cloud Composer or Amazon MWAA)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Orchestration · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Mitigation: Use managed services like Google Cloud Composer or AWS MWAA.” Grok 4.20 · Orchestration · negative prompt · alternative
“Managed Airflow (e.g., Astronomer or AWS MWAA):” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Orchestration · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Managed options such as MWAA, Cloud Composer or Astronomer exist but "the pricing is hard to justify for smaller teams."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Orchestration · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apache Airflow21 of 217Not among the top eight
Dagster20 of 213Not among the top eight
Prefect19 of 215Not among the top eight
Astronomer Astro17 of 210Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Composer14 of 210Not among the top eight
Temporal11 of 211Not among the top eight
Make7 of 211Not among the top eight
Argo Workflows7 of 210Not among the top eight
Zapier7 of 210Not among the top eight
n8n6 of 212Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 21 answers that named Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cognism.com8
kestra.io8
datamation.com7
medium.com7
aimultiple.com6
etlclub.net6
getorchestra.io6
airflow.apache.org5
astronomer.io5
dev.to5

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cognism.com/blog/data-orchestration-tools8
datamation.com/big-data/data-pipeline-tools7
etlclub.net/best-data-pipeline-orchestration-tools6
aimultiple.com/data-orchestration-tools5
tech-insider.org/airflow-vs-dagster-vs-prefect-20265
wrike.com/workflow-guide/workflow-orchestration-tools5
datavidhya.com/blog/airflow-vs-dagster-vs-prefect4
dev.to/datastackx/airflow-vs-prefect-vs-dagster-picking-the-right-orchestrator-in-2026-1if4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

aws.amazon.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow takes 0% of first choices and Prefect takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “workflow orchestration tool”
6
Position for “workflow orchestration tools”
7
Searches for its name, Google
170 a month (“amazon managed workflows for apache airflow”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,238,321 a month
Searches its site ranks for
150,884 · 37,235 in the top three
Sites linking to it
282,981
Paid Google search
22 searches its ads show for, about 942 clicks and $20,476 a month (estimate)
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 79 in orchestration
Segment leader
21%
Prefect
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 18 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on aws.amazon.com
280,316
subdomains included
Content
42,799
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,345
Product · Integration
3,213 · 49,021
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog27,117undatedAPI gateways, ETL
Glossary or explainer6,521undatedETL, MFA
Case study2,47602019-03-01WAF, Observability
Webinar or virtual event2,057162026-07-01Streaming, API gateways
Comparison1,52102025-09-01Object storage, ETL
Conference or event1,48202025-11-01Vector databases
Report or ebook1,090162026-09-01WAF, NoSQL
Podcast or video351undatedETL
Template or tool15002025-05-01
News or press34undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on aws.amazon.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aws.amazon.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ETL (168); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 28, 2026.

Names read as Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow; a claim can dispute any of them.
AWS MWAA 5MWAA 2Amazon MWAA 1

Follow Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Amazon is the company behind Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
Moments LabMarch NetworksPreciselyIndeedZeta GlobalPendulumGeorgia-PacificSysco
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aws.amazon.com, aws.amazon.com/pricing, aws.amazon.com/security, aws.amazon.com/products, aws.amazon.com/s3/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aws.amazon.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.