AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Airparser · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Airparser

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Airparser was named 1 time in Document processing, where Nanonets led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In document processing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Airparser for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Intelligent document processingData platform0%31 of 890%1under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Airparser yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Airparser across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Unstructured/Varied Documents: Airparser or ImageToTable.ai” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Airparser, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Airparser was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ABBYY Vantage3 of 30Not among the top eight
Nanonets2 of 31Not among the top eight
Hyperscience Hypercell2 of 30Not among the top eight
ImageToTable.ai2 of 30Not among the top eight
Lido2 of 30Not among the top eight
Rossum2 of 30Not among the top eight
Parseur1 of 31Not among the top eight
Amazon Textract1 of 30Not among the top eight
Azure AI Document Intelligence1 of 30Not among the top eight
Docparser1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Airparser. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Airparser and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

larksuite.com3
airparser.comYour site2
imagetotable.ai2
reddit.com2
aiinvoiceprocessing.com1
bestdataextractor.com1
bulbthings.com1
capterra.com1
checkthat.ai1
docparser.com1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Airparser came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on airparser.com
1,183
subdomains included
Content
166
counted in the table below
Documentation
49
Product · Integration
0 · 14
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog12072026-10-05RPA
Comparison3512026-09-24
Glossary or explainer1102026-05-31Document processing, EDI
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page airparser.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Airparser

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Airparser is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered document parser that extracts structured data from emails, PDFs, and documents. Production-ready with webhooks, REST API, Python post-processing, GDPR compliance, and 60+ language support.
For
teams evaluating Airparser
Price stated
From 33 to 299 USD airparser.com
Starting price
33 airparser.com
Free plan or trial
Yes — you can start for free with no credit card required. airparser.com
Integrations claimed
7000 airparser.com · 6000 airparser.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications
GDPR compliantISO/IEC 27001GDPR-compliantPCI DSS compliantGDPR complianceAES-256 data encryption
Hosting
GermanyEUUS
Not stated on the pages read
Customers

What Airparser's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: airparser.com, airparser.com/pricing, airparser.com/security, airparser.com/customers, airparser.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Airparser's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Airparser, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Airparser by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Airparser is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Airparser, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at airparser.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.