Every category where a model named Docparser for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	0%	20 of 89	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Docparser yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Docparser across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative5 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Docparser or Parseur if you receive the exact same forms over and over again” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

“Docparser for the cheapest practical start on repetitive forms/documents.” GPT-5.4 mini · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

“Fixed form layouts, lowest cost | Parseur or Docparser” Kimi K2 · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

“Simple data extraction from PDFs/emails. | Basic parsing needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“rigid rule-based parsers like Docparser” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Docparser, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Docparser was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Nanonets16 of 235Not among the top eight

Docsumo16 of 234Not among the top eight

Parseur13 of 236Not among the top eight

Google Document AI11 of 234Not among the top eight

Rossum11 of 230Not among the top eight

ABBYY Vantage10 of 230Not among the top eight

Amazon Textract9 of 231Not among the top eight

UiPath Document Understanding8 of 230Not among the top eight

Azure AI Document Intelligence7 of 231Not among the top eight

Hyperscience Hypercell5 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Docparser. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Docparser and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com17

docsumo.com12

klippa.com12

larksuite.com11

filecenter.com10

parseur.com9

flowwright.com8

llamaindex.ai8

lido.app7

nanonets.com7

101 of the 101 domain citations in answers naming Docparser came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

klippa.com/en/blog/information/idp-software11

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software11

filecenter.com/feeds/blog/document-processing-automation10

g2.com/categories/intelligent-document-processing-idp/small-business10

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software8

parseur.com/blog/idp-pricing8

flowwright.com/blog/8-best-intelligent-document-processing-software7

us.fitgap.com/search/intelligent-document-processing-idp-software/small-business7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

docparser.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Docparser takes 0% of first choices and Nanonets takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “intelligent document processing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “intelligent document processing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“docparser”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 6 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 3,199 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,317 · 54 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,062
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

36 ads · 27 text, 6 image, 3 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2024, as Sureswift Wordwide, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 2 in the year, 34 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 89 in document processing

Segment leader

32%

Nanonets

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on docparser.com

285

subdomains included

Content

153

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

9 · 19

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	132	4	2026-09-15
Comparison	16	0	2024-05-09
Glossary or explainer	4	0	2019-09-24
Case study	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-15Supplier invoice processing blog
2026-09-02Document data extraction software blog
2026-07-26Workflow automation blog
2026-07-08Expense tracking software blog
2026-06-09Docparser advanced features blog
2026-06-08Bank reconciliation blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page docparser.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Docparser

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Docparser is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Automate Data Extraction from PDFs and Documents
docparser.com
For: businesses of all sizes
docparser.com/pricing
Price stated: Monthly Subscription Plans; Billed Yearly; Billed Monthly; Contact For Quote docparser.com/pricing
Starting price: 32.50 docparser.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Try It Free; No credit card required docparser.com
Certifications: high performer spring 2021users love usVerified quality financesonlineGDPR compliant
Customers named: Alpine Industries
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Docparser's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docparser.com, docparser.com/pricing, docparser.com/security, docparser.com/features, docparser.com/blog/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Docparser's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Docparser, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Docparser by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Docparser is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Docparser, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.