| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent document processing | Data platform | 16% | 2 of 89 | 8% | 37 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Rossum is the most cited mid-market pick. Low-code invoice workflows, usable review flows plus workflow automation, from $18,000/year.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Document processing · direct prompt · first choice
“Rossum - Offers low-code invoice workflows and usable review flows plus workflow automation, starting at $18,000/year.” Llama 4 Maverick · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice
“UiPath and Rossum are top choices due to their accuracy, scalability, and ease of integration” Mistral Small · Document processing · direct prompt · first choice
“Otherwise, Rossum or Nanonets are generally highly recommended for mid-sized B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Document processing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise platforms like ABBYY, Rossum, or UiPath for now” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · hard negative
“Rossum is worth evaluating, but it was acquired by Coupa on May 12, 2026. I'd check product roadmap, contract terms, and integration support” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · direct prompt · soft negative
“dramatically cheaper than enterprise IDP platforms like Rossum ($18,000+/year minimum)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 109 answers that named Rossum and are not a share of its labels.
377 of the 377 domain citations in answers naming Rossum came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 46 | 2 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| News or press | 36 | 0 | 2026-05-21 | ||
| Blog | 35 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | 1 | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 11 | 0 | 2026-05-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page rossum.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Rossum's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: rossum.ai, rossum.ai/pricing, trust.rossum.ai, rossum.ai/platform, rossum.ai/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rossum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rossum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rossum by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Rossum is among the products AI models recommend first in Intelligent document processing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.