Every category where a model named Lido for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	4%	10 of 89	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lido yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lido across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative4 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For the most budget-friendly and flexible option, Lido is highly recommended due to its low monthly cost and ease of use.” Mistral Small · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

“my top recommendation is Lido” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lido, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lido was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docsumo8 of 140Not among the top eight

Rossum8 of 140Not among the top eight

Nanonets7 of 142Not among the top eight

ABBYY Vantage7 of 140Not among the top eight

Hyperscience Hypercell6 of 140Not among the top eight

Google Document AI4 of 140Not among the top eight

UiPath Document Understanding4 of 140Not among the top eight

Amazon Textract3 of 140Not among the top eight

Airparser2 of 141Not among the top eight

Azure AI Document Intelligence2 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lido. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Lido and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lido.appYour site9

docsumo.com8

g2.com6

larksuite.com6

guideflow.com5

llamaindex.ai5

astera.com4

klippa.com4

nanonets.com4

raftlabs.com4

Forty-six of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Lido came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software7

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software6

guideflow.com/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software5

astera.com/type/blog/intelligent-document-processing-idp-tools4

klippa.com/en/blog/information/idp-software4

lido.app/blog/best-automated-document-processing-software4

lido.app/blog/best-intelligent-document-processing-software4

llamaindex.ai/insights/best-idp-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lido.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lido takes 4% of first choices and Nanonets takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “intelligent document processing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “intelligent document processing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 33,100 a month (“lido”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 9,264 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,134 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,034 · 18 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,692
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

1 ads · 1 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2026, as Lido, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 89 in document processing

Segment leader

32%

Nanonets

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: in 14 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on lido.app

704

subdomains included

Content

278

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

9 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	216	97	2026-09-29
Comparison	35	33	2026-09-15
Glossary or explainer	12	8	2026-07-22
Case study	8	undated
Template or tool	7	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29How to convert bank of america statement to excel blog
2026-09-28Ai invoice processing factoring companies blog
2026-09-28Best purchase order software blog
2026-09-28Eliminate manual data entry finance blog
2026-09-28Invoice automation blog
2026-09-28Pdf data scraping blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lido.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Lido

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lido is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered document processing platform that extracts structured data from any document and converts it into Excel, Google Sheets, or CSV.
lido.app
For: teams processing 1,000 to 50,000+ documents monthly
lido.app
Price stated: Paid plans start at $29 per month for 100 pages. The Scale plan is $7,840 per year for 42,000 pages and up to 10 users. Enterprise plans with custom volume start from $35,000 per year. lido.app
Starting price: 29 lido.app
Free plan or trial: 50 free pages, no credit card required lido.app
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2 certifiedHIPAA compliantHIPAASOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 Type II Compliant
Customers named: Corporate BillingSmart WarehousingSmoker CPAHocuttRelayACSTOK CommercialASM Global Soldier Field
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Lido's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: lido.app, lido.app/pricing, trust.lido.app, lido.app/solutions/finance, lido.app/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lido's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lido, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lido by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Lido is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lido, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.