Every category where a model named Parseur for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	8%	3 of 89	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Parseur yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Parseur across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels9

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Parseur stands out as one of the best intelligent document processing (IDP) platforms based on its transparent, low-cost pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

“Parseur is the strongest general-purpose choice from the results because it offers transparent pricing, a free plan” Perplexity Sonar · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

“Parseur (free plan → $39/month Pro) or Docsumo ... are the best starting points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Most Small Teams: Parseur” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Parseur, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Parseur was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docsumo23 of 307Not among the top eight

Nanonets23 of 302Not among the top eight

Rossum15 of 301Not among the top eight

ABBYY Vantage15 of 300Not among the top eight

Docparser13 of 300Not among the top eight

Amazon Textract10 of 301Not among the top eight

UiPath Document Understanding10 of 300Not among the top eight

Google Document AI9 of 301Not among the top eight

Azure AI Document Intelligence7 of 301Not among the top eight

Klippa DocHorizon5 of 301Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Parseur. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 30 answers that named Parseur and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docsumo.com22

parseur.comYour site22

g2.com21

klippa.com19

larksuite.com18

nanonets.com16

llamaindex.ai13

raftlabs.com13

filecenter.com11

flowwright.com11

144 of the 166 domain citations in answers naming Parseur came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software19

klippa.com/en/blog/information/idp-software18

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software18

g2.com/categories/intelligent-document-processing-idp/small-business16

parseur.com/blog/best-IDP-tools15

nanonets.com/buyers-guide/best-intelligent-document-processing-software13

parseur.com/blog/idp-pricing13

raftlabs.com/blog/top-intelligent-document-processing-companies13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

parseur.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Parseur takes 8% of first choices and Nanonets takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “intelligent document processing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “intelligent document processing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“parseur”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 9 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 17,087 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,472 · 182 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,845
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 3 of 89 in document processing

Segment leader

32%

Nanonets

First choices: 10 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: in 29 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on parseur.com

5,976

subdomains included

Content

202

counted in the table below

Documentation

174

Product · Integration

94 · 81

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	151	13	2026-09-29	Document processing, RPA
Comparison	34	3	2026-09-18	RPA
Glossary or explainer	16	0	2025-11-18
Case study	1	0	2025-07-08

Most recent

2026-09-29Idp pricing blog
2026-09-29Semantic document understanding blog
2026-09-29State of geo blog
2026-09-21Data residency gdpr document processing blog
2026-09-21Extract structured data from documents at scale blog
2026-09-188570329 ai vs template parsing pros and cons comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page parseur.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Parseur

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Parseur is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI data extraction software
parseur.com
For: Teams across industries
parseur.com
Price stated: Free to start, with 20 pages included every month. parseur.com
Starting price: 0 parseur.com
Free plan or trial: Free plan included, no credit card needed. parseur.com
Integrations claimed: 7 parseur.com/pricing
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II compliantHIPAA compliance is in progressGDPR compliantCCPA compliantPDPA compliantSOC 2 CompliantHIPAA In progress
Hosting: European Union
Customers named: KompenzoTrea Resources

What Parseur's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: parseur.com, parseur.com/pricing, trust.parseur.com, parseur.com/solution. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Parseur's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Parseur, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Parseur by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Parseur is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Parseur, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Parseur is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Parseur is among the products AI models recommend first in Intelligent document processing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/parseur--intelligent-document-processing-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Intelligent document processing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Intelligent document processing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/parseur--intelligent-document-processing-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Intelligent document processing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Intelligent document processing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/parseur--intelligent-document-processing-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Intelligent document processing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Intelligent document processing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.