AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ImageToTable.ai · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ImageToTable.ai

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ImageToTable.ai was named 2 times in Document processing, where Nanonets led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In document processing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ImageToTable.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Intelligent document processingData platform0%25 of 890%2under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ImageToTable.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ImageToTable.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“one of the cheapest micro-budget tools on the market, starting at just $9/month for 150 documents” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative
“Starts around $9–$59/month, making it one of the cheapest entry points on the market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ImageToTable.ai, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ImageToTable.ai was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Airparser2 of 31Not among the top eight
Google Document AI2 of 31Not among the top eight
Nanonets2 of 31Not among the top eight
Parseur2 of 31Not among the top eight
ABBYY Vantage2 of 30Not among the top eight
Amazon Textract2 of 30Not among the top eight
Docparser2 of 30Not among the top eight
Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence1 of 31Not among the top eight
Azure AI Document Intelligence1 of 30Not among the top eight
ExtractBee1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ImageToTable.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named ImageToTable.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

imagetotable.aiYour site3
airparser.com2
capterra.com2
larksuite.com2
puppygraph.com2
thedigitalprojectmanager.com2
101aitools.com1
bestdataextractor.com1
bulbthings.com1
checkthat.ai1

Fourteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming ImageToTable.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on imagetotable.ai
10,000
subdomains included
Content
1,156
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,0031002026-09-17BAS, Document processing
Comparison9842026-09-17EDI
Glossary or explainer4402026-07-02Document processing
Template or tool1062026-07-20BAS
Report or ebook112026-07-27
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page imagetotable.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ImageToTable.ai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ImageToTable.ai is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI extracts exactly the fields you name from any PDF, image, Word, or TXT.
For
Teams and users doing document data entry automation across invoices, receipts, bank statements, purchase orders, packing slips, timesheets, contracts, and other business documents.
Price stated
Free daily quota; pricing is pay-as-you-go with no subscription required. imagetotable.ai
Starting price
0 imagetotable.ai
Free plan or trial
There's a daily free quota so you can try the full feature set without any commitment. Try 5 sample images, get Excel in 30s. imagetotable.ai
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What ImageToTable.ai's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: imagetotable.ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ImageToTable.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ImageToTable.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ImageToTable.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ImageToTable.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ImageToTable.ai, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at imagetotable.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.