| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent document processing | Data platform | 0% | 22 of 89 | 27% | 15 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best suited if your organization is already on Azure; otherwise, integration overhead can be higher.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if You Already Use Microsoft 365... Caveat: Requires a developer or technical person to set up” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative
“For cloud-native scalability, Amazon Textract or Azure Document Intelligence are strong options.” MiniMax M2.5 · Document processing · direct prompt · alternative
“A developer-led team already standardized on Azure | Azure AI Document Intelligence” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if you are non-technical: Azure AI and AWS Textract” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · negative prompt · hard negative
“center on managed analysis APIs, so buyers assemble most of the operational queue, review, routing, and export application around them” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Document processing · comparative prompt · soft negative
“can take significant development to assemble into an end-to-end solution” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Azure AI Document Intelligence” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 47 answers that named Azure AI Document Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Azure AI Document Intelligence, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure AI Document Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure AI Document Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Azure AI Document Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: