| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent document processing | Data platform | 32% | 1 of 89 | 6% | 36 | endorsed leader |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Nanonets if your documents (like invoices) look different every time. Its AI-driven "no-template" model will save you hours of setup.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses with a limited budget, Nanonets is the easiest start: free $50 credits, no platform fee” Muse Glimmer 30B · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice
“Nanonets (Best Overall for Mid-Market): Nanonets is incredibly fast to deploy and highly intuitive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best intelligent document processing platform for a mid-market B2B company is Nanonets.” Llama 4 Maverick · Document processing · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Nanonets can feel less comfortable when the job demands deep auditability, complex exception handling, or highly variable multi-document workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative
“its workflow-based pricing can be complex for buyers seeking stand-alone IDP” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 86 answers that named Nanonets and are not a share of its labels.
319 of the 356 domain citations in answers naming Nanonets came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 65 | undated | |||
| Blog | 45 | 0 | 2026-05-21 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page nanonets.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Nanonets's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: nanonets.com, nanonets.com/solutions/logistics. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nanonets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nanonets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nanonets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Nanonets first in Intelligent document processing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.