Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 40 of 68
2 categories · Named, not rankedAdmin By Request
5Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Admin By Request was named 2 times in PAM and 1 other category, where Delinea Secret Server led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business45 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 73
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Admin By Request for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 2% | 13 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Delinea Secret Server at 37% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 27 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 39% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Admin By Request held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PAM · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 22 → 12 of 68
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 27 of 53 |
| PAM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 13 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Admin By Request across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Admin By Request across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Our Pick: Admin By Request ... completely free for up to 25 seats” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“a good option for SMBs that want device management without the complexity of enterprise solutions” Mistral Small · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Admin By Request, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admin By Request was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Admin By Request, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admin By Request was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Admin By Request. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Admin By Request and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com4
thectoclub.com3
deel.com2
getapp.com2
preyproject.com2
siit.io2
12port.com1
adminbyrequest.comYour site1
aimultiple.com1
apps.shopify.com1
Eighteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Admin By Request came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on adminbyrequest.com
921
subdomains included
Content
304
counted in the table below
Documentation
425
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 243 | 13 | 2026-09-08 | PAM, MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 31 | 0 | 2026-01-10 | PAM, MFA | |
| Case study | 11 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | PAM | |
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-19 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2024-04-26 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2024-03-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-08Supporting emerging talent episode 3 marcus terkildsen at spa francorchamps blog
- 2026-09-05Fake captchas are now aiming for your terminal inside the terminalfix campaign blog
- 2026-09-03Data exfiltration techniques the ways attackers move stolen data out blog
- 2026-08-28Why gcc enterprises need endpoint privilege management now blog
- 2026-08-27Supporting emerging talent episode 2 luca magnussen at misano blog
- 2026-08-24How attackers turn your remote management tools against you blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page adminbyrequest.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Admin By Request
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Admin By Request; a claim can dispute any of them.
Admin by Google 1
Follow Admin By Request
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Admin By Request is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Admin By Request is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Your one-stop endpoint security solution for protection, productivity, & compliance: Admin By Request Privileged Access Management. Local admin rights, managed.
- For
- small businesses or as a proof-of-concept
- Price stated
- Free Plan – 25 EPM seats and 25 Secure Remote Access seats. adminbyrequest.com
- Starting price
- Lifetime Free adminbyrequest.com/en/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Plan adminbyrequest.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27701:2019Cyber EssentialsCyber Essentials PlusGDPRCCPACSA STAR Level 1
- Hosting
- UKNetherlandsGermanySingaporeUnited StatesIrelandUnited Kingdom
- Customers named
- NutrecoSenacor TechnologiesESIS School AssociationATUCoop WholefoodsAfa InsuranceADVAMuskelsvindfonden
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Admin By Request's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: adminbyrequest.com, adminbyrequest.com/en/pricing, trust.adminbyrequest.com, adminbyrequest.com/en/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Admin By Request's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Admin By Request, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Admin By Request by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Admin By Request is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Admin By Request, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.