IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Admin By Request · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Admin By Request

8Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Admin By Request was named 2 times in UEM and 1 other category, where Microsoft Intune led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Admin By Request for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint2%10 of 520%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%
Privileged access managementIdentity and access0%25 of 740%1under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Admin By Request yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Admin By Request across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Admin by Google - a lightweight and easy-to-use MDM solution designed for small and mid-sized businesses.” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best if you want a free endpoint privilege management tool: Admin By Request” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Admin By Request, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admin By Request was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ManageEngine PAM3607 of 81Not in the top three
KeeperPAM6 of 81Not in the top three
Delinea Secret Server5 of 81Not in the top three
CyberArk4 of 81Not in the top three
Teleport4 of 81Not in the top three
JumpServer3 of 82Not in the top three
BeyondTrust3 of 81Not in the top three
HashiCorp Vault3 of 80Not in the top three
ARCON PAM2 of 80Not in the top three
Delinea2 of 80Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Admin By Request. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Admin By Request and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

encomputers.com6
startwithidentity.com6
aimultiple.com5
heimdalsecurity.com4
keepersecurity.com4
g2.com3
gartner.com3
jumpserver.com3
spotsaas.com3
capterra.com2

Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Admin By Request came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Admin By Request

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Admin By Request; a claim can dispute any of them.
Admin by Google 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Admin By Request's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Admin By Request, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adminbyrequest.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack