Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 52 → 9 of 64
1 category · RankedTanium Patch
49Judge labels
4First choices
13Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Patching for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 85 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 69
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 85
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 96
5%33 labels
accepted challenger
In patching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tanium Patch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 17 of 85 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tanium Patch held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Patching · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 of 79, unchanged
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 17 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tanium Patch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tanium Patch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase6 labels2
Comparative16 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative12 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Evaluate alternatives (Automox, NinjaOne, Action1, Tanium)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Patching · negative prompt · alternative
“Tanium rules very large enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative
“clear leaders like Tanium or Ivanti” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Patching · negative prompt · alternative
“Tanium on speed at enormous scale” Muse Glimmer 30B · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Expensive, overkill for SMBs” Grok 4.20 · Patching · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tanium Patch, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tanium Patch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tanium Patch, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tanium Patch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tanium Patch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 49 answers that named Tanium Patch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com26
action1.com23
automox.com22
motadata.com22
heimdalsecurity.com19
acronis.com17
expertinsights.com17
ninjaone.com17
gbhackers.com16
cybersecuritynews.com14
193 of the 193 domain citations in answers naming Tanium Patch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tanium.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tanium Patch takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tanium.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tanium Patch takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “patch management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “patch management tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“tanium patch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 28,789 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,739 · 311 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,651
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $707 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 85 in patching
Segment leader
29%
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 49 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 44 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tanium.com
2,537
subdomains included
Content
2,033
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
46 · 180
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,504 | undated | EDR, Patching | ||
| News or press | 217 | 4 | 2026-09-14 | Patching | |
| Case study | 106 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 82 | 0 | 2025-07-29 | Patching, DLP | |
| Conference or event | 33 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Podcast or video | 29 | 0 | 2025-11-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 23 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2024-12-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14Press releases news or press
- 2026-09-14Tanium joins anthropics project glasswing news or press
- 2026-08-20Tanium reappoints co founder orion hindawi as ceo to drive next chapter of growth news or press
- 2026-08-03Tanium delivers autonomous security at black hat usa 2026 news or press
- 2026-06-02Tanium unveils ai driven product innovations at gartner security risk management summit 2026 conference or event
- 2026-05-21Gartner srm summit 2026 conference or event
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 1, 2026 to June 3, 2026Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit 2026Tanium booth #309, National Harbor, US · exhibited
- June 1, 2026Securing Digital Defense Through Trusted EcosystemsNational Harbor · attended
As the event pages on tanium.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tanium.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Tanium Patch
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tanium Patch; a claim can dispute any of them.
Tanium 8
Follow Tanium Patch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tanium Patch is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tanium Patch is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- McDonald’sNECSAPBest Buy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Tanium Patch's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: tanium.com, tanium.com/about/security, tanium.com/solutions/ai, tanium.com/customers, tanium.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tanium Patch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tanium Patch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tanium Patch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tanium Patch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tanium Patch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.