IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Patch My PC · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Patch My PC

34Judge labels
4First choices
5Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Patching for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 13 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In patching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Patch My PC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Patch managementIT operations and endpoint0%15 of 878%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Patch My PC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Patch My PC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labels4
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“By adding a third-party companion tool like Patch My PC, you get automated third-party catalog patching integrated directly into your existing Intune console.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Patching · scale prompt · alternative
“You'd still need an add-on like Patch My PC (~$3/endpoint) to handle non-Microsoft software.” Kimi K2 · Patching · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Focuses specifically on third-party application patching, popular as SCCM extender.” MiniMax M2.5 · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative
“Excellent for third-party apps, especially with Microsoft ecosystems.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it's not a standalone solution for companies without that tooling” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Patching · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Patch My PC, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Patch My PC was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Action125 of 348Not in the top three
NinjaOne24 of 349Not in the top three
Automox23 of 347Not in the top three
Microsoft Intune16 of 341Not in the top three
Tanium15 of 341Not in the top three
ManageEngine Endpoint Central11 of 340Not in the top three
PDQ Connect9 of 342Not in the top three
Atera9 of 340Not in the top three
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus8 of 341Not in the top three
Datto RMM7 of 340Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Patch My PC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 34 answers that named Patch My PC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

heimdalsecurity.com21
learn.g2.com18
ninjaone.com17
cyberpress.org16
acronis.com15
expertinsights.com15
gbhackers.com15
motadata.com11
mspcompared.com10
g2.com9

147 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming Patch My PC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Patch My PC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Patch My PC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at patchmypc.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack