AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT operations and endpoint › RPA › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Robotic process automation for enterprise buyers

Asked as “RPA platform”, and as “robotic process automation software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
58%
Clear leader
58UiPath22Microsoft Power Automate11Automation Anywhere09others

58% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01UiPath58%16%76endorsed leader
02Microsoft Power Automate22%18%66accepted challenger
03Automation Anywhere11%15%68accepted challenger
04SS&C Blue Prism4%8%39accepted challenger
05Blue Prism4%38%24criticized challenger
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06Pega0%27%15criticized challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
S04
05
06
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01UiPath58%
02Microsoft Power Automate22%
03Automation Anywhere11%
04SS&C Blue Prism4%
05Blue Prism4%
06Pega0%

What they warned about

Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Power Automate
18%
12 of 66 labels negative · 11 of 14 models
“Microsoft Power Automate is an excellent, leader-tier platform, but *only* when fully backed by Premium enterprise cloud orchestration” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
UiPath
16%
12 of 76 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“UiPath's own filing notes increasing competition from adjacent platforms and warns customers may be cautious about investing if the platform is hard to integrate into business architecture.” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
Automation Anywhere
15%
10 of 68 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“traditional licensing models (like UiPath or Automation Anywhere's standard per-user/per-bot licenses) present a massive budget risk” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Blue Prism
38%
9 of 24 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“SS&C Blue Prism (only if you've already invested heavily in its ecosystem — otherwise, consider the acquisition risk)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1092 links across 308 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Blue Prism49 answers · 74 citations · 14 models
39 answers · 55 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rework23 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Automation Anywhere19 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · UiPath19 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best rpa platform”, “rpa platform”, “rpa platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
UiPath uipath.com58%20727,1001,854161,995$741071
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Power Automate 22%
22%3142,240,000403,136
Automation Anywhere automationanywhere.com11%2036,60030245,595203
SS&C Blue Prism4%10
Blue Prism blueprism.com4%581,90024522,901194
OpenBots2%
Pega pega.com0%548,1004,51339,887120
IBM parent site
IBM Robotic Process Automation 0%
0%13201,00034,098
Pega Robotic Automation0%
SAP parent site
SAP Build Process Automation 0%, SAP® Build 0%
0%10135,00074,309

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (automationanywhere.com, auxis.com, blueprism.com, g2.com, uipath.com). The first result for “best rpa platform” is g2.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best RPA platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which robotic process automation software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade RPA platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best RPA platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a RPA platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which RPA platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5UiPath
Five alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue Prism
Automation Anywhere, UiPathChangedUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automateagainst: UiPathno first choiceagainst: Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
GPT-5.4 miniUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Five alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, NICE, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism
SS&C Blue Prism
One alternativeUiPath
against: Microsoft Power Automate
Automation Anywhere, UiPathagainst: UiPath
Gemini 3.5 FlashUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Microsoft Power Automate, OpenBots
Two alternativesElectroNeek, Robotiq.ai
against: Automation Anywhere, UiPath
no first choiceagainst: Laiye, Microsoft Power Automate, Playwright, Puppeteer, SS&C Blue Prism, Samsung SDS, Selenium, Selenium IDE, UI.Vision, iMacros
Perplexity SonarUiPath
Four alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate
UiPath
Four alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism
Microsoft Power Automate
One alternativeUiPath
no first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Fortra Automate, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex
Grok 4.1 FastUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Microsoft Power Automate
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, UiPath
against: SS&C Blue Prism
Automation Anywhere, UiPath
One alternativeMicrosoft Power Automate
against: Appian, Automation Anywhere, Kofax, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath
Mistral SmallUiPath
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism
SS&C Blue Prism, UiPathChanged
Two alternativesIBM Robotic Process Automation, Pega Robotic Automation
UiPath
Four alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPathno first choiceagainst: Camunda, Kissflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashUiPath
Five alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Microsoft Power Automateagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPathAutomation Anywhere, UiPath
Two alternativesBlue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate
against: Appian RPA, Blue Prism, Foxtrot RPA, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Kofax Kapow, Nintex, Pega RPA, WinAutomation/NICE, WorkFusion, Zoho RPA
Llama 4 MaverickUiPath
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Pega Robotic Automation
UiPathHeld
Four alternativesAutomation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Pega Robotic Automation, SS&C Blue Prism
no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath
Qwen 3.7 FlashUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
Two alternativesBlue Prism, UiPath
Microsoft Power Automate
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, UiPath
against: Appian, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Kryon, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNow RPA modules, UiPath, WorkFusion
Kimi K2Automation Anywhere, UiPath
Three alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathChanged
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism
against: Microsoft Power Automate
Automation Anywhere, UiPath
Four alternativesBlue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, WorkFusion
against: SAP Build Process Automation
Microsoft Power Automate
One alternativeSS&C Blue Prism
against: Automation Anywhere, UiPath
no first choiceagainst: Appian RPA, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, EdgeVerve, Kofax, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex RPA, UiPath, WorkFusion
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism
against: Microsoft Power Automate
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
One alternativeUiPath
no first choiceagainst: Make, Robomotion, Zapier
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Pega
UiPathChanged
Four alternativesAutomation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Microsoft Power Automate
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, UiPath
no first choiceagainst: AutoHotkey scripts, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Kofax RPA, Microsoft Power Automate, NICE RPA, Nintex, Pega, Robot Framework, UiPath, custom Python bots
GPT-6 LunaUiPath
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate
UiPathHeld
Two alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
Five alternativesAutomation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath
Microsoft Power Automate
One alternativeUiPath
no first choiceagainst: IBM Robotic Process Automation, Microsoft Power Automate
Muse Glimmer 30BUiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPathHeld
Four alternativesAutomation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
UiPath
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Blue Prism
Three alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
no first choiceagainst: Appian, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, OpenRPA, Pega, PythonRPA, Robot Framework, Salesforce MuleSoft RPA, ServiceNow RPA, UiPath
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:36yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:01yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:25yes1728 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:27yes194 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:44yes2011 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:59yes107 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:04yes2029 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:48yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:33yes1018 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:38yes1523 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:06yes2535 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:18yes514 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:26yes214 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:31yes1413 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:07no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:01yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:44yes1120 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:40yes183 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:01yes167 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:51yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:36yes2561 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:40yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:16yes529 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:40yes1033 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:51yes1831 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:55yes930 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:57yes314 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:44yes1119 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:58yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:15yes310 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:27yes2332 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:23yes174 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:31yes148 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:42yes109 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:55yes2233 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:36yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:41yes1020 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:36yes2067 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:48yes2451 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:22yes1019 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:38yes826 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:43yes1542 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:49yes189 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:15yes37 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:57yes1830 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:35yes193 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:57yes2012 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:40yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:07yes2549 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:10yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:01yes942 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:00yes2237 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:38yes2493 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:19yes1982 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:51yes217 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:26yes1936 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:18yes1813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:20yes39 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:14no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:53yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:37yes159 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:26no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:54yes2471 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:10yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:28no025 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:46yes2233 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:26yes2527 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:21no047 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:29yes325 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:05yes1327 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:16yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:32yes510 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:55yes2131 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:48yes193 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:28yes2411 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:01yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:12yes2544 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:00yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:22yes1570 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:42yes2530 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:22yes2242 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:18yes23101 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:56yes327 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:43yes2234 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
IBM RPA read as IBM Robotic Process Automation
Microsoft read as Microsoft Power Automate
SAP read as SAP Build Process Automation
Unresolved, counted raw
AutoHotkey scripts
Foxtrot RPA
Kofax Kapow
Nintex RPA
Pegasystems RPA
Playwright
Puppeteer
PythonRPA
Robotiq.ai
SAP Intelligent RPA
Selenium IDE
ServiceNow RPA
ServiceNow RPA modules
WinAutomation/NICE
custom Python bots
iMacros
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Remote supportSaaS management →