Every category where a model named Spendflo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SaaS management platforms	IT operations and endpoint	4%	6 of 64	5%	19	accepted challenger
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	4%	7 of 113	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spendflo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spendflo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	0	3
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	3	0	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase21 labels7

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a mid-sized B2B company, Spendflo stands out if your primary goals are cost savings, centralized procurement, and SaaS management.” Mistral Small · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Spendflo if your priority is a combined SaaS spend, procurement, and license management tool” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with Zluri or Spendflo as they offer strong ROI through waste reduction” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Celoxis or Spendflo” MiniMax M2.5 · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“flag integration problems for several platforms, including BetterCloud, CloudEagle, Lumos, Zluri, Productiv, and Spendflo” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spendflo, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendflo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Torii33 of 519Compare →

Zluri33 of 514Compare →

Zylo31 of 516Compare →

BetterCloud22 of 512Compare →

Vendr22 of 510Not among the top eight

Sastrify21 of 510Not among the top eight

Corma17 of 510Compare →

1Password SaaS Manager11 of 510Not among the top eight

Cledara8 of 514Compare →

Cloudeagle8 of 510Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spendflo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 51 answers that named Spendflo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

corma.io32

zluri.com28

cloudeagle.ai26

g2.com25

spendflo.comYour site22

zylo.com20

josys.com19

skima.ai15

cloudnuro.ai14

sourceforge.net14

193 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming Spendflo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

corma.io/blog/top-15-saas-management-solutions-for-mid-sized-companies26

zluri.com/blog/saas-management-platforms18

skima.ai/blog/product-deep-dives/best-saas-management-platforms15

cloudeagle.ai/blogs/best-saas-management-platforms14

corma.io/blog/best-saas-management-platforms-for-small-and-mid-size-companies-in-202614

josys.com/article/saas-management-platforms14

corma.io/blog/20-best-saas-management-platforms-in-202613

spendflo.com/blog/application-portfolio-management-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

spendflo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spendflo takes 4% of first choices and Torii takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “saas management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “saas management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“spendflo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 18,298 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 8,961 · 154 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,091
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

45 ads · 35 text, 7 image, 3 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as Spendflo Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 10 in the year, 35 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 64 in saas management

Segment leader

34%

Torii

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 51 answers
Its own site cited: in 51 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on spendflo.com

1,598

subdomains included

Content

830

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

37 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	598	106	2026-09-28	TPRM, FinOps
Comparison	146	1	2026-09-15
Template or tool	25	0	2026-05-20
Report or ebook	23	0	2025-09-09
Case study	20	undated
Glossary or explainer	15	2	2026-09-15
Webinar or virtual event	2	undated
Conference or event	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28Accounts payable controls blog
2026-09-28Accounts payable management blog
2026-09-28Accounts payable reconciliation blog
2026-09-28Accounts payable workflow blog
2026-09-28Procurement orchestration guide blog
2026-09-28Integrated payables solutions blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page spendflo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Spendflo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Spendflo is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Meet Flo. AI Agents for Procurement.
spendflo.com
For: Procurement and Finance teams who own the number and do the work.
spendflo.com
Price stated: You pay only for what Flo closes. Not per seat. Not per user. spendflo.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 certification
Customers named: AcumaticaRevealCaringPuffcoOttimateCrownpeakChurnzeroTabby
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Spendflo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: spendflo.com, spendflo.com/pricing, spendflo.com/security, spendflo.com/platform-terms-and-conditions, spendflo.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spendflo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spendflo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spendflo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Spendflo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spendflo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.