1 category · RankedProductiv
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS management platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 64 of 64 | 65% | 20 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Productiv across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If proving software ROI is your top priority, Productiv provides unmatched usage intelligence.” Kimi K2 · SaaS management · direct prompt · alternative
“Understanding if users actually *use* software | Productiv” Kimi K2 · SaaS management · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you care most about app usage/adoption: look at Productiv.” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Productiv | AI-powered usage insights | ~$15K” Kimi K2 · SaaS management · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Productiv has shut down: Productiv was historically a leading recommendation in this space, but the company abruptly ceased operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“The abrupt shutdown of a market leader, *Productiv*, in August 2026 (which deleted all customer data with only four days' notice)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · scale prompt · hard negative
“Productiv is no longer an active option; its support notice says it ceased operations on August 6, 2026” GPT-6 Luna · SaaS management · comparative prompt · hard negative
“avoid Productiv—its own notice says it ceased operations on August 6, 2026” GPT-6 Luna · SaaS management · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Productiv, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Productiv was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 64 answers that named Productiv and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
241 of the 241 domain citations in answers naming Productiv came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
productiv.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Productiv takes 0% of first choices and Torii takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“productiv”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 906 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 75 · 6 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,142
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 64 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Productiv
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Productiv is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- officially ceased operations on August 6, 2026
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Productiv's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: productiv.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Productiv's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Productiv, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Productiv by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Productiv is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Productiv, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.