Every category where a model named Sastrify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SaaS management platforms	IT operations and endpoint	0%	18 of 64	18%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sastrify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sastrify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Combines discovery, cost optimization, renewal alerts, and vendor management in one platform.” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Some platforms (such as Vertice, Tropic, or Sastrify) offer "managed procurement"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · scale prompt · alternative

“good if your main need is procurement and vendor management” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS management · direct prompt · alternative

“Sastrify offers excellent value at a lower entry price” Kimi K2 · SaaS management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid on a Budget ... Sastrify (from ~€12,500/year)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS management · budget prompt · hard negative

“Lacks certain features, such as vendor assessment tools, which can limit overall effectiveness.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative

“Frequent criticism around opaque or high pricing structures” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sastrify, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sastrify was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Torii32 of 367Not among the top eight

Zylo28 of 365Not among the top eight

Zluri28 of 361Not among the top eight

Spendflo21 of 360Not among the top eight

BetterCloud20 of 363Not among the top eight

Vendr18 of 360Not among the top eight

Corma16 of 361Not among the top eight

1Password SaaS Manager12 of 360Not among the top eight

Productiv12 of 360Not among the top eight

Cledara10 of 363Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sastrify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 36 answers that named Sastrify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

corma.io27

zluri.com22

cloudeagle.ai20

g2.com19

skima.ai16

josys.com15

cloudnuro.ai12

zylo.com12

bettercloud.com11

live-digital.co.uk11

No domain is on file for Sastrify, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

corma.io/blog/top-15-saas-management-solutions-for-mid-sized-companies24

zluri.com/blog/saas-management-platforms19

skima.ai/blog/product-deep-dives/best-saas-management-platforms16

corma.io/blog/best-saas-management-platforms-for-small-and-mid-size-companies-in-202613

cloudeagle.ai/blogs/best-saas-management-platforms12

josys.com/article/saas-management-platforms12

live-digital.co.uk/blog/best-saas-management-platforms11

corma.io/blog/20-best-saas-management-platforms-in-202610

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Sastrify stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“sastrify”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 18 of 64 in saas management

Segment leader

34%

Torii

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 36 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Sastrify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sastrify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sastrify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sastrify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Sastrify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sastrify, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.