Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 58 of 68
1 category · Named, not rankedWALLIX
14Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WALLIX was named 6 times in PAM, where Delinea Secret Server led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business64 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market70 of 73
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 55
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WALLIX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 0% | 70 of 73 | 50% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Delinea Secret Server at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WALLIX held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PAM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 36 → 66 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 17 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 70 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WALLIX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WALLIX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“flagged for limited scalability and integration challenges, especially in complex or rapidly growing environments” Mistral Small · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Critical SAML authentication bypass vulnerability (2026)... Review patch status for WALLIX” Kimi K2 · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“both Arcon and Wallix fell out of the "Leaders" category” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WALLIX, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WALLIX was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WALLIX, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WALLIX was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WALLIX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named WALLIX and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cybersecuritynews.com9
ciopages.com8
expertinsights.com8
heimdalsecurity.com8
learn.g2.com4
netwrix.com4
securden.com4
startwithidentity.com4
bankinfosecurity.com3
delinea.com3
Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming WALLIX came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wallix.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WALLIX takes 0% of first choices and Delinea Secret Server takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wallix.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WALLIX takes 0% of first choices and Delinea Secret Server takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “privileged access management platform”
8
Position for “privileged access management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“wallix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,275 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 636 · 26 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,777
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 70 of 73 in PAM
Segment leader
37%
Delinea Secret Server
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on wallix.com
3,168
subdomains included
Content
575
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
32 · 377
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 371 | 0 | 2026-05-15 | PAM, SIEM | |
| Report or ebook | 59 | 3 | 2026-09-21 | PAM | |
| News or press | 47 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | PAM, XDR | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 37 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | PAM, IaC | |
| Case study | 33 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | PAM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2025-09-05 | PAM | |
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-04-18 | PAM, ZTNA | |
| Conference or event | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Rethinking pam in the age of ai non human identities and digital sovereignty webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-23Cysec kuwait conference or event
- 2026-09-23Cysec mena conference or event
- 2026-09-23Wallix strengthens its growth strategy in the dach region with deloitte germany joining its global gsi alliances program news or press
- 2026-09-22Nis2 and access control can you prove who did what webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-21Ot guide measuring what access costs you report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page wallix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as WALLIX
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WALLIX; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wallix 1
Follow WALLIX
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WALLIX is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WALLIX is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- WALLIX provides cybersecurity solutions for simple, secure and trusted access, to protect digital and industrial environments.
- For
- enterprises and organizations
- Free plan or trial
- FREE TRIAL wallix.com/partners
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What WALLIX's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wallix.com, wallix.com/products, wallix.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WALLIX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WALLIX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WALLIX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WALLIX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WALLIX, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.