IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › ARCON PAM · September 2026 Edition

ARCON · 1 category · Named, not ranked

ARCON PAM

20Judge labels

0First choices

10Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ARCON PAM was named 7 times in PAM, where ManageEngine PAM360 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business53 of 55

under the label threshold

Mid-market54 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise30 of 49

under the label threshold

In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ARCON PAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	54 of 74	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ARCON PAM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ARCON PAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong compliance needs in APAC | ARCON” Kimi K2 · PAM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Highly customized for finance and banking.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High-Risk Platforms to Avoid or Be Extremely Cautious About ... 2. ARCON ... Poor documentation and steep learning curve” Kimi K2 · PAM · negative prompt · hard negative

“ARCON PAM's interface can feel dated compared to cloud-native alternatives, and complex policy configurations require significant admin effort” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“uneven account discovery, UI complaints (Arcon), limited integrations, scalability tweaks needed” Grok 4.1 Fast · PAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ARCON PAM, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ARCON PAM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BeyondTrust19 of 202Not in the top three

CyberArk18 of 2010Not in the top three

Delinea18 of 201Not in the top three

WALLIX13 of 200Not in the top three

KeeperPAM8 of 203Not in the top three

ManageEngine PAM3607 of 201Not in the top three

One Identity Safeguard7 of 200Not in the top three

One Identity5 of 200Not in the top three

StrongDM4 of 201Not in the top three

HashiCorp Vault4 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ARCON PAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named ARCON PAM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com13

heimdalsecurity.com12

gartner.com11

startwithidentity.com11

zluri.com10

netwrix.com8

tech-insider.org7

techcloudpro.com7

cybervendorguide.com6

decryptiondigest.com6

Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming ARCON PAM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-privileged-access-management-pam12

heimdalsecurity.com/blog/privileged-access-management-pam-software-solutions11

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-tools8

gartner.com/reviews/market/privileged-access-management7

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-for-enterprises7

techcloudpro.com/blog/cyberark-vs-delinea-vs-beyondtrust-pam-comparison7

zluri.com/eye-on-identity/pam-solutions-comparison7

cybervendorguide.com/guides/privileged-access-management6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ARCON PAM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ARCON PAM; a claim can dispute any of them.

ARCON 4Arcon 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ARCON PAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ARCON PAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at arcon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.