2 categories · Named, not rankedWalledAI
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 2% | 34 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 0% | 49 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated WalledAI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with WalledAI for employee AI governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“AI DLP tools like WalledAI inspect the prompt before it is submitted, automatically masking or redacting sensitive data” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WalledAI, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WalledAI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named WalledAI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming WalledAI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 50 | 22 | 2026-10-02 | AI governance, DLP | |
| Comparison | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 2 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-02Mooncake ai vulnerability unauthenticated access blog
- 2026-10-01Ftc probe ai agent security blog
- 2026-09-30Nvidia ai agent security external enforcement blog
- 2026-09-29Florida openai independent safety controls blog
- 2026-09-28Gartner ai governance audit 2027 blog
- 2026-09-27Openai sandbox escape dns blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page walled.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow WalledAI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WalledAI is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise AI Governance Platform
- For
- Enterprises
- Price stated
- The Starter plan is USD 15 per user per month. walled.ai/pricing
- Starting price
- 15 walled.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free 2-week pilot walled.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRPDPAIMDA-listedSOC 2EU AI ActMAS TRM
- Hosting
- USUKEUAPACSingaporeOn-premisePrivate cloudAir-gapped
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, customers
What WalledAI's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: walled.ai, walled.ai/pricing, walled.ai/compliance/pdpa, walled.ai/platform/ai-dlp, walled.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WalledAI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WalledAI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WalledAI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WalledAI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WalledAI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.