Every category where a model named Virima for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	16 of 61	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Virima yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Virima across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider are Bluetally and Virima, which offer more advanced features and integrations, but may require a larger budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose Virima if your environment is more complex and you need CMDB depth” Perplexity Sonar · ITAM · direct prompt · alternative

“If you need deeper CMDB capabilities, Virima is also a strong contender.” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · direct prompt · alternative

“Unique hybrid discovery + live CMDB + bi‑directional ITSM integration” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Virima, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Virima was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ServiceNow IT Asset Management12 of 186Not in the top three

ManageEngine AssetExplorer11 of 182Not in the top three

InvGate Asset Management9 of 181Not in the top three

Freshservice8 of 183Not in the top three

Ivanti Neurons for ITAM8 of 180Not in the top three

Lansweeper8 of 180Not in the top three

Device427 of 180Not in the top three

Flexera One6 of 181Not in the top three

Snipe-IT6 of 181Not in the top three

Asset Panda5 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Virima. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Virima and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

virima.comYour site18

cloudaware.com14

blog.invgate.com9

assetmanagement.global8

assetpanda.com6

parse.gl6

setyl.com6

guideflow.com5

techradar.com5

expertinsights.com4

Sixty-three of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Virima came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

virima.com/blog/top-asset-management-tools-you-need-to-know-about17

cloudaware.com/blog/asset-management-tools12

blog.invgate.com/it-asset-management-software9

cloudaware.com/blog/enterprise-asset-management-software8

assetmanagement.global/blog/it-asset-management/best-it-asset-management-software6

parse.gl/prompts/p/what-is-the-best-it-asset-management-software--b2b36f47-92f1-4929-b3b8-6

assetpanda.com/resource-center/compare/best-it-asset-management-software-top-itam-platform5

guideflow.com/blog/it-asset-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Virima

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Virima; a claim can dispute any of them.

Virima ITAM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Virima's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Virima, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at virima.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.