GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode Static Analysis
Zero of fourteen models named GitHub Advanced Security first on the direct prompt; zero named Veracode Static Analysis. GitHub Advanced Security was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Veracode Static Analysis by fourteen and GitHub Advanced Security carries 16 labels and Veracode Static Analysis 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the static application security testing page.
By framing
GitHub Advanced SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVeracode Static Analysis
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, GitHub Advanced Security and Veracode Static Analysis were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 125 answers naming GitHub Advanced Security and the 138 naming Veracode Static Analysis. In those answers Veracode Static Analysis took the first choice one time and GitHub Advanced Security two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
GitHub Advanced Security Veracode Static Analysis first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GitHub Advanced Security on the left and Veracode Static Analysis on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
GitHub Advanced Security2%#6 of 13Veracode Static Analysis0%#12 of 13GitHub Advanced Security2%#6 of 10Veracode Static Analysis2%#7 of 10Veracode Static Analysis13%#2 of 10GitHub Advanced Security2%#8 of 10What the models said about GitHub Advanced Security
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“GHAS is sold as an add-on license that can be quite expensive for a mid-sized B2B budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Top Recommendation: GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL if your company is deeply GitHub-native and wants SAST in the same platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Veracode Static Analysis
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What I'd Avoid for Mid-Market: Checkmarx and Veracode are powerful but typically start at $60K–$100K+/year” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Full scans can delay fast-moving dev cycles, there's no on-premise option with code upload raising security concerns, and pricing can be steep” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“not necessarily the one with the most heavy-duty enterprise compliance rules (like legacy tools Veracode or Fortify)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“the recommended static code security scanner for a mid-sized B2B company could be either Checkmarx or Veracode” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Excels in broad language/framework support (including legacy/binary), whole-app analysis, and enterprise integrations” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
“Highly regulated environments, on-premises requirements, or teams needing very deep taint analysis.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.