AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Varonis · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Varonis

24Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in AI security for mid-market buyers
Rank 47 of 233 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Varonis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%47 of 2330%4under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
Identity threat detection and responseIdentity and access0%27 of 1050%4under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51%
AI governance platformsData platform0%112 of 1350%1under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%
Client-side protectionSecurity operations0%108 of 1200%1under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%
Vulnerability management platformsSecurity operations0%64 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Varonis yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Varonis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00202
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash12205
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Varonis is widely considered the leader because they map who has access to what data at a granular level.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“such as Wiz or Varonis, since these tools are commonly evaluated for AI/LLM risk visibility” GPT-5.4 mini · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Data-Heavy / Compliance Focus ... Varonis is the best choice.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITDR · direct prompt · alternative
“Varonis has aggressively pivoted to securing unstructured data” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI security · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Varonis, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Varonis was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wiz6 of 240Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike5 of 241Not among the top eight
Semperis Directory Services Protector5 of 240Not among the top eight
Huntress Managed ITDR4 of 242Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection4 of 241Not among the top eight
CyberArk Identity Security Platform4 of 240Not among the top eight
OneTrust4 of 240Not among the top eight
Credo AI3 of 241Not among the top eight
BeyondTrust3 of 240Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview3 of 240Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Varonis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 24 answers that named Varonis and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

varonis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Varonis takes 0% of first choices and SentinelOne Singularity takes 11%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
12,100 a month (“varonis”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
621 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 136,629 a month
Searches its site ranks for
16,593 · 1,264 in the top three
Sites linking to it
16,531
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
78 ads · 57 text, 15 image, 6 video · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2023, as Varonis Systems, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 32 in the year, 46 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 47 of 233 in AI security
Segment leader
11%
SentinelOne Singularity
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
24 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on varonis.com
3,656
subdomains included
Content
1,215
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
28 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog871262026-09-25GRC
Webinar or virtual event218undated
Case study48undated
Glossary or explainer4302025-12-01SIEM
Comparison2412026-08-31SIEM
Report or ebook6undated
Conference or event2undated
Template or tool1undated
Podcast or video1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page varonis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Varonis

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Varonis is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The leading data and AI security platform that proactively reduces risk, enforces policies, and stops active threats with our AI-native automation.
For
companies
Free plan or trial
Free risk assessment varonis.com
Certifications
FedRAMPSOC 2 Type IISOC 3ISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018ISO 27701PCI:DSS
Customers named
Grand Canyon EducationAFLNorfolk SouthernFFVA Mutual
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, hosting

What Varonis's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: varonis.com, trust.varonis.com, varonis.com/platform-accessibility-statement, varonis.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Varonis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Varonis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Varonis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Varonis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Varonis, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at varonis.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.