Index › Products › UltraVNC · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

UltraVNC

6Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UltraVNC was named 3 times in Remote support and 1 other category, where Splashtop Remote Support led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business49 of 62

under the label threshold

Mid-market76 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise84 of 89

under the label threshold

In remote support · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UltraVNC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Remote support and remote access	IT operations and endpoint	0%	76 of 77	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Splashtop Remote Support at 23%
Remote monitoring and management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	57 of 62	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UltraVNC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UltraVNC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the most abused tools include open-source tools, or tools whose source code has leaked, such as MeshAgent, as well as common protocols and tools such as RDP and VNC / UltraVNC.” Muse Glimmer 30B · RMM · negative prompt · hard negative

“repeatedly listed among the top 5 remote-access/RMM tools most abused by threat actors” Muse Glimmer 30B · Remote support · negative prompt · hard negative

“VNC is highly targeted by cybercriminals... Avoid VNC” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Remote support · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UltraVNC, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UltraVNC was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AnyDesk6 of 60Not among the top eight

TeamViewer6 of 60Not among the top eight

Ammyy Admin5 of 60Not among the top eight

ConnectWise ScreenConnect5 of 60Not among the top eight

LogMeIn3 of 60Not among the top eight

MeshCentral3 of 60Not among the top eight

Splashtop Remote Support2 of 60Not among the top eight

BeyondTrust Bomgar1 of 61Not among the top eight

ScreenMeet1 of 61Not among the top eight

Acronis1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UltraVNC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named UltraVNC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

acronis.com3

ammyy.com3

netsecurity.com3

pasqualepillitteri.it3

reddit.com3

teamviewer.com3

bankinfosecurity.com2

cisa.gov2

cymulate.com2

eset.com2

No domain is on file for UltraVNC, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

acronis.com/en/tru/posts/remote-access-hardening-playbook-reducing-rmm-tool-risk-for-smbs3

acronis.com/en/tru/posts/the-remote-access-blind-spot-an-analysis-of-rmm-tool-risk-for-smb3

ammyy.com/en/admin_mu.html3

netsecurity.com/how-attackers-use-legitimate-remote-support-tools-for-silent-persistence3

cymulate.com/blog/screenconnect-anydesk-threats-to-remote-access-tools2

eset.com/afr/about/newsroom/press-releases-afr/research/operation-buhtrap-ammyy002

pasqualepillitteri.it/en/news/13193/teamviewer-anydesk-old-cracked-remote-access-attacks2

redcanary.com/threat-detection-report/trends/rmm-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow UltraVNC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UltraVNC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UltraVNC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UltraVNC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where UltraVNC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name UltraVNC, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.