IT AI Index
Index Developer platform API management › Kong Gateway vs Tyk
API management · September 2026 Edition

Kong Gateway vs Tyk

Seven of twelve models named Kong Gateway first on the direct prompt; three named Tyk. Both were named by all twelve models and Kong Gateway carries 64 labels and Tyk 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Kong Gateway

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Tyk

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share37%13%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6441A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Kong Gateway reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Azure API Management was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Kong Gateway vs Gravitee · Tyk vs Gravitee

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Kong GatewayFirst choices, of twelve modelsTyk
Direct73
Paraphrase40
Comparative30
Budget-constrained531 against Kong Gateway · 1 against Tyk
Scale-constrained10
Negative105 against Kong Gateway · 2 against Tyk
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Kong Gateway and Tyk stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
GLM 4.7 FlashXKong Gateway, Tyk alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management

Kong Gateway first, Tyk an alternative

6 of 12 modelsTyk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniKong Gateway alternatives: Boomi, IBM API Connect
Grok 4.1 FastKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management, Tyk
Mistral SmallAzure API Management, Kong Gateway alternatives: Tyk
Qwen 3.7 FlashKong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management
Kimi K2Kong Gateway alternatives: Apigee, Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tyk
MiniMax M2.5Azure API Management, Kong Gateway alternatives: TIBCO Mashery, Tyk

Tyk first, Kong Gateway an alternative

2 of 12 modelsKong Gateway was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTyk alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management, Gravitee, Kong Gateway
DeepSeek V4 FlashTyk alternatives: Kong Gateway

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Perplexity SonarBoomi alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Azure API Management, WSO2 API Manager
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Kong Gateway leads by eleven points.
Kong Gateway17%#3 of 10
Tyk6%#5 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Kong Gateway leads by twenty-four points.
Kong Gateway37%#1 of 11
Tyk13%#2 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Kong Gateway leads by fourteen points.
Kong Gateway16%#3 of 9
Tyk2%#6 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Kong Gateway

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Other outdated API gateways such as Kong, 3scale, and Layer7 are also not fit for modern cloud-native architectures.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Kong: avoid it if you do not have in-house Lua expertise” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative

What the models said about Tyk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Had a major leadership change, pricing restructuring, and some stability issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“the management console/dashboard UI isn't in the OSS edition; you'll likely need the paid version” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Tyk or Kong are the strongest choices due to their balance of enterprise features, competitive pricing, and flexible deployment options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“If you are a startup with a technical team: Choose Tyk. You will save money long-term by self-hosting” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.