AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › API gateways › Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk
API gateways · October 2026 Edition

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Two of fourteen models named Amazon API Gateway first on the direct prompt; two named Tyk. Amazon API Gateway was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Tyk by fourteen and Amazon API Gateway carries 61 labels and Tyk 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Amazon API Gateway

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Tyk

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share9%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6147A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Amazon API Gateway reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Kong Gateway was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Kong Gateway vs Amazon API Gateway · Kong Gateway vs Tyk · Apache APISIX vs Amazon API Gateway

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API gateways page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Amazon API GatewayFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTyk
Direct221 against Amazon API Gateway
Paraphrase001 against Amazon API Gateway
Comparative10
Budget-constrained314 against Amazon API Gateway
Scale-constrained01
Negative007 against Amazon API Gateway · 5 against Tyk
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Amazon API Gateway and Tyk were named in the same answer 195 times, of the 370 answers naming Amazon API Gateway and the 239 naming Tyk. In those answers Tyk took the first choice twenty-five times and Amazon API Gateway twenty-two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Amazon API Gateway and Tyk stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Amazon API Gateway Tyk first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Amazon API Gateway on the left and Tyk on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Amazon API Gateway and Tyk stood in it.

Amazon API Gateway first, Tyk an alternative

2 of 14 modelsTyk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Amazon API Gateway, Kong Gateway
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmazon API Gateway, Apigee alternatives: Kong Gateway, Tyk

Tyk first, Amazon API Gateway an alternative

2 of 14 modelsAmazon API Gateway was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTyk alternatives: Gravitee, Kong Gateway, Zuplo
Muse Glimmer 30BKong Gateway, Tyk alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Azure API Management
Perplexity SonarKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Cleo Integration Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management, Tyk, Zuplo
DeepSeek V4 FlashKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Tyk, Zuplo
GLM 4.7 FlashXKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Tyk, Zuplo
GPT-6 LunaKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Azure API Management

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallZuplo alternatives: Apigee, Axway API Gateway
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Kong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management
MiniMax M2.5Kong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, NGINX, Red Hat 3scale

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Amazon API Gateway leads by sixteen points.
Amazon API Gateway22%#3 of 10
Tyk6%#4 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Amazon API Gateway leads by two points.
Amazon API Gateway9%#3 of 11
Tyk8%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Tyk leads at enterprise.
Tyk6%#3 of 9
Amazon API Gateway4%#6 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Amazon API Gateway

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“avoid per-call pricing models (like AWS API Gateway at $1–$3.50 per million calls)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Kong (especially with enterprise support) or AWS API Gateway are solid choices, as they balance power, scalability, and cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“If your infrastructure is already on AWS, this is usually the default starting point.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want no infrastructure overhead, go with Zuplo or AWS API Gateway” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Tyk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Verdict: Cautious — great performance as a proxy, but operational complexity, licensing surprises, and production failure patterns are concerning.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mentions of Kong (2024 incident) and Tyk (early 2025 advisory) tied to overbroad credentials.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Kong (specifically Kong Konnect) and Tyk are widely considered the top contenders"” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.