1 category · RankedExtraHop RevealX
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network detection and response | Security operations | 4% | 7 of 102 | 15% | 26 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated ExtraHop RevealX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Overall Industry Leader: ExtraHop RevealX ... named a Leader in the very first Gartner Magic Quadrant” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NDR · direct prompt · first choice
“ExtraHop if your main need is excellent network visibility and fast investigations.” GPT-5.4 mini · NDR · direct prompt · first choice
“is a stronger enterprise-grade option, but it appears better suited to larger or more advanced deployments than a typical mid-sized company” Perplexity Sonar · NDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If your main goal is detecting intrusions—not routine traffic visibility—I'd look at ExtraHop RevealX instead.” GPT-6 Luna · NDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Darktrace, Vectra AI, ExtraHop” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NDR · budget prompt · hard negative
“Licensing complexity (based on Discovered Devices); can generate high alert volumes” MiniMax M2.5 · NDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“commercial options like Vectra AI, Darktrace, or ExtraHop ($50K–$500K+/year)” Grok 4.1 Fast · NDR · budget prompt · soft negative
“It's expensive and often relies on multiple appliances being deployed” Claude Haiku 4.5 · NDR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ExtraHop RevealX, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ExtraHop RevealX was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 83 of the 85 answers that named ExtraHop RevealX and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
271 of the 303 domain citations in answers naming ExtraHop RevealX came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
extrahop.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ExtraHop RevealX takes 4% of first choices and ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“extrahop revealx”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,608 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,585 · 199 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,409
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $514 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 85 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 83 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,502 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | EDR, SIEM | |
| Report or ebook | 71 | 0 | 2025-08-18 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Case study | 53 | 0 | 2018-11-28 | ||
| News or press | 46 | 1 | 2026-07-22 | SIEM | |
| Template or tool | 33 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 32 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | EDR, SIEM | |
| Comparison | 26 | 0 | 2024-01-29 | XDR, SIEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-04 | XDR, SOAR | |
| Conference or event | 22 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 21 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | CSPM, XDR |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09What is a harness and why it matters to security leaders glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-04Context harness model a new operating model for the agentic soc webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-12What is context the foundation for ai era security glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-04Defending against ai powered adversary webinar or virtual event
- 2026-07-22Agentic soc alliance news or press
- 2026-06-235 kubernetes threats behind real world breaches and how to defend against them blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page extrahop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (14); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as ExtraHop RevealX
Follow ExtraHop RevealX
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ExtraHop RevealX is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Consolidate your NDR, NPM, and IDS tools into a single platform that delivers a holistic view of all network activity
- For
- enterprise security teams
- Certifications
- FedRAMP® Authorization
- Customers named
- Home DepotViasatSeattle Children’s HospitalUlta BeautyEMEA Government Tech HubBankLogistics and Transportation LeaderHomebuilder
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What ExtraHop RevealX's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: extrahop.com, trust.extrahop.com, extrahop.com/platform, extrahop.com/customer-stories, extrahop.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ExtraHop RevealX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ExtraHop RevealX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ExtraHop RevealX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ExtraHop RevealX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ExtraHop RevealX, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.