AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › NetWitness · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

NetWitness

22Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NetWitness was named 5 times in NDR and 1 other category, where ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ndr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NetWitness for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network detection and responseSecurity operations0%90 of 10225%4under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations0%71 of 1070%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NetWitness yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NetWitness across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00303
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“NetWitness and some deployments of Darktrace are frequently cited as problematic due to complexity, limited threat detection, and support issues.” Mistral Small · NDR · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NetWitness, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetWitness was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Darktrace12 of 213Not among the top eight
Vectra AI9 of 213Not among the top eight
Corelight Open NDR9 of 210Not among the top eight
ExtraHop RevealX6 of 211Not among the top eight
Cisco Secure Network Analytics5 of 210Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiNDR5 of 210Not among the top eight
Splunk Enterprise Security4 of 212Not among the top eight
IBM QRadar4 of 210Not among the top eight
Microsoft Sentinel4 of 210Not among the top eight
Stellar Cyber Open XDR4 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NetWitness. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named NetWitness and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

netwitness.comYour site14
comparitech.com10
g2.com10
peerspot.com10
darktrace.com7
gartner.com7
vectra.ai7
fidelissecurity.com6
ciopages.com5
cybersecuritynews.com5

Sixty-seven of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming NetWitness came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

netwitness.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, NetWitness takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ndr platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ndr platforms”
4
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“netwitness”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
8 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,685 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,633 · 171 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,495
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
42 ads · 23 image, 12 text, 7 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as NetWitness Security LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 30 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 90 of 102 in NDR
Segment leader
21%
ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on netwitness.com
1,086
subdomains included
Content
639
counted in the table below
Documentation
112
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog409122026-09-28SIEM, SOAR
Webinar or virtual event6222026-07-10SASE, MFA
Report or ebook51undatedSIEM, SASE
Conference or event3202025-09-12
News or press2622026-08-27XDR, MDR
Podcast or video2092026-07-13SIEM, SASE
Comparison1602026-04-27EDR, SIEM
Glossary or explainer1312026-07-06SIEM, SOAR
Case study5undated
Template or tool512026-07-16SIEM
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page netwitness.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (53); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as NetWitness

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NetWitness; a claim can dispute any of them.
NetWitness (by RSA) 1Netwitness 1RSA NetWitness 1

Follow NetWitness

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

NetWitness is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Unified Threat Detection & Response Platform
For
Top Govt Agencies and Enterprises
Customers named
OoredooRC WilleyDefense Contractor
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What NetWitness's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: netwitness.com, netwitness.com/platform/threat-detection-and-response, netwitness.com/resources/case-studies, netwitness.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetWitness's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetWitness, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NetWitness by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where NetWitness is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name NetWitness, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netwitness.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.