| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network detection and response | Security operations | 4% | 6 of 102 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Real-time visibility into encrypted, east-west, and north-south traffic; cloud-scale machine learning; packet-level insights” Mistral Small · NDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“ExtraHop excels when you need deep packet analysis and decryption” MiniMax M2.5 · NDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Vectra AI and ExtraHop Reveal(x) are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · NDR · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Vectra AI or ExtraHop Reveal(x)” MiniMax M2.5 · NDR · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 40 answers that named ExtraHop Reveal and are not a share of its labels.
180 of the 180 domain citations in answers naming ExtraHop Reveal came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,502 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | EDR, SIEM | |
| Report or ebook | 71 | 0 | 2025-08-18 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Case study | 53 | 0 | 2018-11-28 | ||
| News or press | 46 | 1 | 2026-07-22 | SIEM | |
| Template or tool | 33 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 32 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | EDR, SIEM | |
| Comparison | 26 | 0 | 2024-01-29 | XDR, SIEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-04 | XDR, SOAR | |
| Conference or event | 22 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 21 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | CSPM, XDR |
Every page extrahop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (14); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ExtraHop Reveal's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: extrahop.com, trust.extrahop.com, extrahop.com/platform, extrahop.com/customer-stories, extrahop.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ExtraHop Reveal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ExtraHop Reveal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ExtraHop Reveal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: