IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Transmit Security · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Transmit Security

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Transmit Security was named 2 times in CIAM, where Auth0 led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 60

under the label threshold

In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Transmit Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	37 of 74	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Transmit Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Transmit Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Transmit Security, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Transmit Security was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Auth08 of 97Not in the top three

Ping Identity8 of 91Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra External ID7 of 90Not in the top three

Frontegg6 of 90Not in the top three

WorkOS6 of 90Not in the top three

Descope5 of 91Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito4 of 90Not in the top three

IBM Verify4 of 90Not in the top three

Stytch3 of 90Not in the top three

LoginRadius2 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Transmit Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Transmit Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

startwithidentity.com6

gartner.com5

bankinfosecurity.com4

descope.com4

expertinsights.com4

forrester.com4

guideflow.com4

guptadeepak.com4

peerspot.com4

pingidentity.com4

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Transmit Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-ciam-for-enterprises6

bankinfosecurity.com/microsoft-ping-okta-dominate-access-management-gartner-mq-a-272144

descope.com/blog/post/ciam-solutions4

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-customer-identity-and-access-managem4

guideflow.com/blog/ciam-software4

guptadeepak.com/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-depth-comparison4

peerspot.com/categories/customer-identity-and-access-management-ciam4

securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-2026-in-depth-comparison4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Transmit Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Transmit Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at transmitsecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.