IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform was named 1 time in ZTNA, where Cloudflare One led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market63 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 64

under the label threshold

In ztna · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Zero trust network access	Network and edge	0%	63 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare One at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cloudflare One2 of 31Not in the top three

Zscaler Private Access2 of 31Not in the top three

Check Point Harmony SASE2 of 30Not in the top three

Fortinet FortiGate2 of 30Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access2 of 30Not in the top three

Tailscale2 of 30Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon1 of 31Not in the top three

SentinelOne Singularity1 of 31Not in the top three

Akamai Enterprise Application Access1 of 30Not in the top three

Cloudflare Access1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com3

gartner.com3

peerspot.com3

cybersecuritynews.com2

petronellatech.com2

portnox.com2

startwithidentity.com2

terrazone.io2

acenetworks.eu1

analyticsinsight.net1

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybersecuritynews.com/best-ztna-solutions2

expertinsights.com/network-security/the-top-zero-trust-network-access-solutions2

gartner.com/reviews/product/fortinet-universal-ztna/alternatives2

peerspot.com/categories/ztna2

petronellatech.com/blog/zero-trust-vendors-compared-top-10-smbs-20262

portnox.com/cybersecurity-101/zero-trust/who-are-the-best-ztna-providers2

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-8-zero-trust-network-access-tools2

terrazone.io/best-ztna-solution-enterprise-2026-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at threatlocker.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.