Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 5 → 14 of 79
2 categories · RankedSyxsense
11Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Patching for mid-market buyers
Rank 14 of 85 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market14 of 85
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In patching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Syxsense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 14 of 85 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 29 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Syxsense held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Patching · by segment
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patching | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 14 of 85 |
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 29 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Syxsense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Syxsense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ivanti Neurons / Syxsense are viable alternatives for organisations that want patching inside a broader IT operations platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Patching · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Syxsense if you want patching tied closely to vulnerability context” Perplexity Sonar · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
“Cost: ~$9/device/month or $960/year for 10 devices” Kimi K2 · Vuln management · budget prompt · alternative
“Vulnerability-prioritized patching + orchestration” Grok 4.20 · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Syxsense, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syxsense was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Syxsense, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syxsense was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Syxsense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Syxsense and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cybersecuritynews.com6
syncrosecure.com6
techrepublic.com6
acronis.com5
cyberpress.org5
devopsschool.com5
expertinsights.com5
gbhackers.com5
heimdalsecurity.com5
atera.com4
Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Syxsense came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
syxsense.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Syxsense takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
syxsense.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Syxsense takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “patch management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “patch management tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“syxsense”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,573 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 695 · 18 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,424
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 85 in patching
Segment leader
29%
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on syxsense.com
344
subdomains included
Content
277
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 240 | 0 | 2025-03-11 | Patching, UEM | |
| Report or ebook | 21 | undated | Patching | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | UEM | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | Patching | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-03-11Microsoft patch tuesday march 2025 update blog
- 2024-12-10December 2024 microsoft patch tuesday blog
- 2024-11-22Apple patches for zero day vulnerabilities blog
- 2024-11-12November 2024 microsoft patch tuesday blog
- 2024-10-31Endpoint and vulnerability management integration blog
- 2024-10-28Building proactive vulnerability management blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page syxsense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Syxsense
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Syxsense; a claim can dispute any of them.
Syxsense Manage 1
Follow Syxsense
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Syxsense is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Syxsense is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated Endpoint and Vulnerability Management
- For
- IT Leaders, IT Operations, Security Operations, MSPs/MSSPs
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Syxsense's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: syxsense.com, syxsense.com/pricing-syxsense, syxsense.com/compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Syxsense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Syxsense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Syxsense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Syxsense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Syxsense, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.