Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 20 of 64
1 category · Named, not rankedHeimdal Patch & Asset Management
8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Heimdal Patch & Asset Management was named 6 times in Patching, where ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 69
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 85
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In patching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Heimdal Patch & Asset Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 15 of 85 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus at 29% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Patching · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 12 of 79
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patching | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 15 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Heimdal Patch & Asset Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Heimdal Patch & Asset Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Heimdal if you want patch management as part of a broader security suite and are comfortable with more setup effort.” Perplexity Sonar · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
“Good for mid-market teams wanting security-grade patching with compliance-ready audit trails.” Mistral Small · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
“If security posture is your #1 priority: Consider Heimdal or Syxsense.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
“a strong option if you prioritize security-grade audit trails” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Heimdal Patch & Asset Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Heimdal Patch & Asset Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Heimdal Patch & Asset Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Heimdal Patch & Asset Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cyberpress.org7
expertinsights.com6
heimdalsecurity.comYour site5
motadata.com5
acronis.com4
cybersecuritynews.com4
gbhackers.com4
getapp.com4
automox.com3
capterra.com3
Forty of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Heimdal Patch & Asset Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
heimdalsecurity.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
heimdalsecurity.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Heimdal Patch & Asset Management takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “patch management tool”
8
Position for “patch management tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 111,895 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,777 · 765 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,192
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $16 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 85 in patching
Segment leader
29%
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on heimdalsecurity.com
1,782
subdomains included
Content
1,568
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
53 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,289 | 15 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 130 | 0 | 2025-09-12 | ||
| Comparison | 119 | 2 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 11 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2025-05-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2019-02-05 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2023-01-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Ai pacing cybersecurity defense blog
- 2026-09-09Ai adoption that pays off blog
- 2026-09-08Phishing statistics analysis blog
- 2026-09-03Shift browser signed adware fingerprints endpoint before payload blog
- 2026-08-28Threatlocker alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-27Insider threat statistics blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page heimdalsecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
Heimdal 2
Follow Heimdal Patch & Asset Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Heimdal Patch & Asset Management is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Heimdal Patch & Asset Management is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automate and Secure Your Assets
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial heimdalsecurity.com
- Customers named
- Anglia Ruskin UniversityÄlmhult Kommun (Sweden)Porsanger KommuneVingåkers KommunManchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of OxfordSt George’s University HospitalsElanders Sweden
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Heimdal Patch & Asset Management's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: heimdalsecurity.com, heimdalsecurity.com/enterprise/pricing-request, heimdalsecurity.com/windows-10-security-guide/security, heimdalsecurity.com/products/antivirus-software, heimdalsecurity.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Heimdal Patch & Asset Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Heimdal Patch & Asset Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Heimdal Patch & Asset Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Heimdal Patch & Asset Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.