Every category where a model named Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Patch management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	10 of 87	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Action1 at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase8 labels5

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Ivanti Patch Manager and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus are frequently cited as “leaders” for mid‑market teams” MiniMax M2.5 · Patching · direct prompt · first choice

“Choose Ivanti if you are a large enterprise that prioritizes risk-based vulnerability management” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Automox16 of 202Not in the top three

Action111 of 202Not in the top three

NinjaOne11 of 202Not in the top three

Tanium11 of 202Not in the top three

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus10 of 202Not in the top three

Microsoft Intune10 of 200Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central7 of 200Not in the top three

Microsoft Configuration Manager5 of 200Not in the top three

SolarWinds Patch Manager5 of 200Not in the top three

Patch My PC4 of 201Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 20 answers that named Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com9

acronis.com8

cyberpress.org8

cybersecuritynews.com7

worldmetrics.org7

heimdalsecurity.com6

ninjaone.com5

devopsschool.com4

expertinsights.com4

kaseya.com4

Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-patch-management-compared-29

acronis.com/en/blog/posts/best-patch-management-software-and-tools-20268

cyberpress.org/patch-management-by-business-size-28

heimdalsecurity.com/blog/automated-patch-management-software6

cybersecuritynews.com/best-patch-management-software5

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-patch-management-software-for-business4

kaseya.com/blog/best-patch-management-software4

motadata.com/blog/best-patch-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ivanti Patch Manager 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ivanti.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.