Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 62 of 64
Ivanti · 1 category · RankedIvanti Neurons for Patch Management
60Judge labels
2First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Patching for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 85 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 69
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 85
0%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 96
3%34 labels
accepted challenger
In patching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 12 of 85 | 0% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Patching · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 10 of 79
Enterprise▼−12Since September 2026: 13% → 2%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 13% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 9 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patching | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 12 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative18 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ivanti Neurons / Syxsense are viable alternatives for organisations that want patching inside a broader IT operations platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Patching · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Ivanti is a heavyweight in the enterprise space... Best For: Large Enterprises and Security Operations Centers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative
“willing to pay for it, Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is another strong enterprise-grade option” GPT-5.4 mini · Patching · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: enterprises needing third-party application patching with on-prem/cloud control.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Patching · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 60 answers that named Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
action1.com26
automox.com26
learn.g2.com26
motadata.com22
acronis.com21
heimdalsecurity.com20
ninjaone.com20
expertinsights.com19
gbhackers.com17
atera.com16
213 of the 213 domain citations in answers naming Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“ivanti neurons for patch management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Ivanti's site (ivanti.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 85 in patching
Segment leader
29%
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 49 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ivanti 9Ivanti Neurons 2Ivanti Patch Management 2Ivanti (Patch for Endpoint Manager) 1Ivanti Neurons (formerly Landesk) 1Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management / Ivanti Endpoint Manager 1Ivanti Neurons for Patches 1
Follow Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ivanti is the company behind Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management.ShowHide
The company
Ivanti is the company behind Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Risk-Based Cloud Patch Management
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- The pricing model includes a platform fee and device-based licenses. ivanti.com/products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management
- Free plan or trial
- Discovery Assessment gratuita e senza impegno ivanti.com/it/products/autonomous-patch-management
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ivanti.com/products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management, advantagelearning.ivanti.com/pages/details-page-ivanti-neurons-for-patch-intelligence, ivanti.com/it/products/autonomous-patch-management, ivanti.com/it/products/ivanti-neurons-patch-for-intune, ivanti.com/it/products/ivanti-neurons-for-patch-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.