Email security · October 2026 Edition
SpamTitan vs IRONSCALES
Zero of fourteen models named SpamTitan first on the direct prompt; one named IRONSCALES. SpamTitan was named by twelve of the fourteen models and IRONSCALES by twelve and SpamTitan carries 19 labels and IRONSCALES 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share16%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1926A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SpamTitan reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Proofpoint Email Protection was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs SpamTitan · Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs IRONSCALES · SpamTitan vs Mimecast Email Security
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email security page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SpamTitanFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIRONSCALES
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained80
Scale-constrained00
Negative01
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, SpamTitan and IRONSCALES were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 49 answers naming SpamTitan and the 75 naming IRONSCALES. In those answers IRONSCALES took the first choice four times and SpamTitan one.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SpamTitan and IRONSCALES stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
SpamTitan IRONSCALES first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SpamTitan on the left and IRONSCALES on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SpamTitan and IRONSCALES stood in it.
IRONSCALES first, SpamTitan not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSpamTitan was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Kimi K2IRONSCALES alternatives: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Barracuda Email Protection alternatives: IRONSCALES, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Gemini 3.5 FlashCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration alternatives: Abnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection, IRONSCALES
Qwen 3.7 FlashProofpoint Email Protection alternatives: Abnormal AI, IRONSCALES, Microsoft Defender for Office 365
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Defender for Office 365 alternatives: Abnormal AI, Barracuda Integrated Email Protection, IRONSCALES, Proofpoint Email Protection
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender for Office 365 alternatives: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender for Office 365 alternatives: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Mimecast Email Security
Grok 4.1 FastProofpoint 365 Total Protection alternatives: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security
Mistral SmallCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Proofpoint Email Protection alternatives: Mimecast Email Security, Symantec Email Security.cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashAbnormal AI alternatives: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Mimecast Email Security
GPT-6 LunaAbnormal AI alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Muse Glimmer 30BProofpoint Email Protection alternatives: Abnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Guardian Digital, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, ThreatDown Email Security, Trustifi
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
SpamTitan11%#4 of 10IRONSCALES11%#3 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
SpamTitan leads by fourteen points.
SpamTitan16%#2 of 9IRONSCALES2%#8 of 9Enterprise
The order flips: IRONSCALES leads at enterprise.
IRONSCALES2%#5 of 8SpamTitan0%#– of 8What the models said about SpamTitan
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The best email security platform for a company with a limited budget is SpamTitan, which is a budget-friendly spam and malware filtering solution for SMBs and MSPs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Specifically mentioned as "budget-friendly" and "solid choice for budget-conscious teams"... For smallest budgets: Start with SpamTitan or Barracuda” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Barracuda and SpamTitan are consistently highlighted as the most affordable and accessible options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about IRONSCALES
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“prioritize Behavioral AI (like Abnormal AI or IRONSCALES) over signature-based gateways” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I'd recommend IRONSCALES as the top choice” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Modern solutions (like Abnormal Security, Check Point/Avanan, Ironscales, or Sublime Security) connect directly to Microsoft or Google via API.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs SpamTitanMicrosoft Defender for Office 365 vs IRONSCALESSpamTitan vs Mimecast Email SecuritySpamTitan vs Barracuda Email ProtectionSpamTitan vs Proofpoint Email ProtectionSpamTitan vs Check Point Harmony Email & CollaborationSpamTitan vs Abnormal AIMimecast Email Security vs IRONSCALESBarracuda Email Protection vs IRONSCALESProofpoint Email Protection vs IRONSCALESCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs IRONSCALESAbnormal AI vs IRONSCALESAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full email security standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.