Every category where a model named SOTI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	14 of 52	12%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SOTI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SOTI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SOTI or 42Gears fit better for rugged/mobile-first device fleets.” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · direct prompt · alternative

“Specialists for rugged devices, kiosks, and purpose-built hardware” Mistral Small · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you have rugged, kiosk, retail, or industrial hardware → SOTI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“The go-to UEM for rugged, purpose-built, and industrial devices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“may not be the best option for organizations with a diverse device ecosystem” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

“No published pricing, making cost unpredictable (Omnissa, SOTI)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SOTI, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SOTI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune28 of 3018Not in the top three

Jamf28 of 300Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE25 of 303Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central19 of 306Not in the top three

42Gears SureMDM16 of 300Not in the top three

Ivanti15 of 300Not in the top three

NinjaOne13 of 300Not in the top three

ManageEngine9 of 300Not in the top three

IBM MaaS3608 of 300Not in the top three

Citrix Endpoint Management7 of 300Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SOTI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named SOTI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com26

cyberpress.org23

cybersecuritynews.com22

expertinsights.com20

syncrosecure.com17

ciopages.com12

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com11

softwarereviews.com11

venn.com10

peerspot.com9

161 of the 161 domain citations in answers naming SOTI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared25

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size22

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions19

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp18

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools17

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/endpoint-management-uem12

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-bran11

softwarereviews.com/awards/data-quadrant-awards-2024-unified-endpoint-management11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SOTI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SOTI; a claim can dispute any of them.

SOTI (MobiControl) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SOTI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SOTI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at soti.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.