Every category where a model named Ivanti for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	42 of 52	45%	20	criticized challenger
Patch management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	67 of 87	33%	12	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ivanti yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ivanti across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	4	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	2	5
Mistral Small	1	1	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	1	4
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained16 labelsNone

Negative33 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative82 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Look at Omnissa (Workspace ONE), Ivanti, or ManageEngine Endpoint Central for deeper cross-platform parity.” Kimi K2 · UEM · scale prompt · alternative

“Need strong endpoint visibility/remediation/security operations → Tanium / Ivanti / Absolute” GPT-5.4 mini · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Ivanti or Quest KACE are better if legacy Windows management is a major requirement.” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · direct prompt · alternative

“Best-in-class for organizations transitioning from legacy Windows management to modern UEM” GLM 4.7 FlashX · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Ivanti Products — High Caution ... Multiple critical vulnerabilities in recent years suggest systemic security challenges” Kimi K2 · Patching · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid starting new projects with: Ivanti (due to recent security trauma and fragmentation)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Ivanti - as mentioned in a Reddit comment, it is advised to "NEVER use it".” Llama 4 Maverick · Patching · negative prompt · hard negative

“Often considered overpriced for small businesses. Many sysadmins report the product feels stagnant and poorly documented.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ivanti, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ivanti was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune55 of 8228Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE41 of 824Not in the top three

Jamf37 of 822Not in the top three

NinjaOne36 of 827Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central29 of 822Not in the top three

ManageEngine22 of 820Not in the top three

Automox20 of 824Not in the top three

Tanium17 of 823Not in the top three

Action116 of 825Not in the top three

SOTI15 of 820Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ivanti. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 70 of the 82 answers that named Ivanti and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org42

gbhackers.com40

expertinsights.com32

cybersecuritynews.com23

ciopages.com22

syncrosecure.com21

g2.com17

heimdalsecurity.com17

ninjaone.com17

computerworld.com14

245 of the 245 domain citations in answers naming Ivanti came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size27

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared24

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/endpoint-management-uem22

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools20

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions16

gbhackers.com/best-patch-management-compared-216

cyberpress.org/patch-management-by-business-size-215

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-patch-management-software-for-business14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ivanti

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ivanti; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ivanti (Endpoint Manager / EPMM / Neurons for MDM) 1Ivanti (Endpoint Manager / Neurons for UEM) 1Ivanti (Endpoint Manager / Neurons) 1Ivanti (Endpoint Manager, EPMM, etc.) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivanti's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivanti, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ivanti.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.