IT AI Index
Index Vendors › SOCRadar · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SOCRadar

25Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Threat intel for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 128 in the mid-market standing
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SOCRadar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Threat intelligence platformsSecurity operations6%8 of 1280%7under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SOCRadar yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SOCRadar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash20002
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels3
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best overall threat intelligence platform is usually SOCRadar or Cyble Vision” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose SOCRadar or Flare ... This yields the fastest ROI for a mid-sized B2B company.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SOCRadar is currently one of the strongest options for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice
“The company also offers a free edition of its platform, making essential threat intelligence capabilities accessible to a wide range of organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SOCRadar, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SOCRadar was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Recorded Future21 of 254Not in the top three
ThreatConnect12 of 250Not in the top three
MISP10 of 252Not in the top three
Flare9 of 250Not in the top three
GreyNoise8 of 250Not in the top three
NordStellar7 of 254Not in the top three
OpenCTI7 of 251Not in the top three
Anomali ThreatStream7 of 250Not in the top three
Mandiant6 of 250Not in the top three
ZeroFox6 of 250Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SOCRadar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 25 answers that named SOCRadar and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com14
upguard.com12
esecurityplanet.com11
analyticsinsight.net10
b2breviews.com10
cyware.com9
cyble.com8
g2.com8
sourceforge.net7
costbench.com6

Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming SOCRadar came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SOCRadar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SOCRadar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socradar.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack