Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 of 69, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedSmartSuite
14Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SmartSuite was named 4 times in TPRM and 1 other category, where UpGuard led with 55%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 71
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 87
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise47 of 72
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SmartSuite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 2% | 10 of 87 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 45 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SmartSuite held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · TPRM · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 69 → 10 of 82
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPRM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 69 → 10 of 87 |
| GRC | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 75, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SmartSuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SmartSuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a company with a limited budget, SmartSuite is particularly attractive due to its free plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · TPRM · budget prompt · first choice
“SmartSuite with its all-in-one risk management capabilities, intuitive interface and affordable pricing structure” Muse Glimmer 30B · TPRM · budget prompt · alternative
“flexible GRC platforms like LogicGate, Hyperproof, Compyl, or SmartSuite are recommended” Mistral Small · GRC · negative prompt · alternative
“move to SmartSuite for a DIY approach while keeping your budget strictly fixed.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SmartSuite, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SmartSuite was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SmartSuite, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SmartSuite was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SmartSuite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named SmartSuite and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
smartsuite.comYour site14
enzuzo.com5
learn.g2.com5
upguard.com5
g2.com4
projectmanagers.net4
riskpublishing.com4
sourceforge.net4
us.fitgap.com4
complyjet.com3
Thirty-eight of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming SmartSuite came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
smartsuite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SmartSuite takes 2% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
smartsuite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SmartSuite takes 2% of first choices and UpGuard takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “third-party risk management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “third-party risk management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 19,550 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,035 · 179 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,478
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 87 in TPRM
Segment leader
55%
UpGuard
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on smartsuite.com
4,886
subdomains included
Content
1,363
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,540
Product · Integration
176 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 510 | 0 | 2026-06-05 | ||
| Blog | 360 | 0 | 2026-06-19 | ||
| Comparison | 159 | 0 | 2026-03-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 144 | undated | |||
| Case study | 131 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 51 | 26 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2025-02-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2024-04-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10Forms support for checklist field type CGeJKOLiQrCdVtq template or tool
- 2026-08-14Assign and mention teams in comments and checklists uu3W2NJACfamDjn template or tool
- 2026-07-02Ai governance intake checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-02Board grc reporting checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-02Connected grc implementation checklist first 90 days template or tool
- 2026-07-02Control library cleanup checklist template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page smartsuite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SmartSuite
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SmartSuite is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SmartSuite is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cloud-based enterprise platform for Connected GRC, unifying risk, compliance, audit, third-party risk, resilience, and the workflows that drive execution.
- For
- the enterprise
- Price stated
- SmartSuite is priced per seat. Team is $15 per seat per month billed annually ($20 billed monthly) with a minimum of 3 billable users. Professional is $32 per seat per month billed annually ($36 monthly) with a minimum of 5. Enterprise is custom priced. smartsuite.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 15 smartsuite.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial smartsuite.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6000 smartsuite.com/platform
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAISO/IEC 27001PCI-DSSSOC 2 Type II compliantISO 27001 certified
- Hosting
- U.S. + EU Data CentersEuropean data residency
- Customers named
- MediaLab 3D SolutionsProgettiamo AutonomiaMGT (Layer3 Communications)Apple BankTerrayGeorgetown UniversityLyneerAnalytic Vizion
What SmartSuite's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: smartsuite.com, smartsuite.com/pricing, trust.smartsuite.com, smartsuite.com/platform, smartsuite.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SmartSuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SmartSuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SmartSuite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SmartSuite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SmartSuite, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.